Obidi is Trying to Write a New Foundation for Physics: Not Adding a New Equation to the Existing House, But Tearing Up the Floorboards Altogether

 Skip to content

2. Theory-of-Entropicity-ToE-Research-Lab-The-Aether-Live-Lab-NoteBook

Repository navigation

• Code
• Issues
• Pull requests
• Agents

1. Theory-of-Entropicity-ToE-Research-Lab-The-Aether-Live-Lab-NoteBook
2. /markdown-from-clickup-live-lab-notebook

/

Obidi-is-Trying-to-Write-a-New-Foundation-for-Physics-Not-Adding-a-New-Equation-to-the-Existing-House-But-Tearing-Up-the-Floorboards-Altogether.md

Entropicity

1 minute ago

42 lines (23 loc) · 3.37 KB

Obidi is Trying to Write a New Foundation for Physics: Not Adding a New Equation to the Existing House, But Tearing Up the Floorboards Altogether

https://github.com/Entropicity/Theory-of-Entropicity-ToE-Research-Lab-The-Aether-Live-Lab-NoteBook/blob/fa5aed03a53f87f02eb9f4f8c65833a1473bb5c5/markdown-from-clickup-live-lab-notebook/Obidi-is-Trying-to-Write-a-New-Foundation-for-Physics-Not-Adding-a-New-Equation-to-the-Existing-House-But-Tearing-Up-the-Floorboards-Altogether.md

Obidi-is-Trying-to-Write-a-New-Foundation-for-Physics-Not-Adding-a-New-Equation-to-the-Existing-House-But-Tearing-Up-the-Floorboards-Altogether.md

That's exactly Obidi's ambition, and it's a genuinely grand one.

What Obidi is attempting is the same kind of move Einstein made:

Not adding a new equation to the existing house, but tearing up the floorboards.

Einstein replaced Newton's absolute space and time with curved spacetime; Obidi wants to replace Einstein's curved spacetime with the dynamics of an entropic field.

It's worth putting this in historical perspective, because foundation-rewriting attempts have a very specific track record. The successful ones — Newton unifying terrestrial and celestial motion, Maxwell unifying electricity and magnetism, Einstein with relativity, the quantum mechanics revolution — all share a pattern: they didn't just reinterpret old results, they predicted something new that the old framework couldn't, and experiment confirmed it. Maxwell predicted radio waves; Einstein predicted the bending of starlight and Mercury's orbit.

The unsuccessful attempts mostly died at one of three checkpoints:

- The correspondence problem.

Any new foundation has to reproduce everything the old one got right. ToE has to show that general relativity and quantum mechanics fall out of the entropy field as approximations, the way Newtonian mechanics falls out of relativity at low speeds. The "Obidi Action" and the Master Entropic Equation are meant to be the machinery for this, but the burden of proof is enormous.

- The prediction problem.

A new foundation earns its keep by predicting something the old one can't — something testable. So far ToE's distinctive claims (like fundamental entropic non-simultaneity) live at scales or in forms that seem very hard to test.

- The community problem.

New foundations don't win by argument alone; they win when other physicists pick them up, extend them, and find them fruitful. Right now ToE exists mainly in the author's own publications, which is normal for a brand-new idea but also the stage where most such ideas stall.

One thing is definitely and undeniably in Obidi's favor conceptually: Obidi is not coming from nowhere. There's a real lineage here to which Obidi absolutely belongs:

Jacobson deriving Einstein's equations from thermodynamics in the 90s, Verlinde's entropic gravity in 2010, Bianconi's Gravity from Entropy (GfE), the whole kit and caboodle of the "spacetime/gravity is emergent" research program.

Obidi is pushing that lineage to its most radical conclusion: entropy isn't emergent, it's fundamental.

---

---

Scholium

This (Obidi's ToE) is bold, courageous, audacious, and provocative at once!

It really is. There's something admirable about someone looking at the entire edifice of modern physics and saying "no, the foundation is wrong, let me rebuild it from entropy." Most people spend their careers adding bricks; Obidi is trying to pour a new foundation.

And honestly, physics needs people like that every generation. Every revolution looked audacious and a little unhinged at first. Einstein was a patent clerk telling the world's physicists that time itself was relative.