On the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) as a Prolegomenon to the Foundation of Modern Theoretical Physics

In this piece, we aim to present what is more or less like a distinguished preface to a major theoretical treatise on the Theory of Entropicity ToE.

So, we shall begin with the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) as a conceptual prolegomenon to the foundation of modern Theoretical Physics, establishing its scope, purpose, and intellectual direction; after which we shall embark on an exposition of its more abstruse mathematical foundations.

---

A Historical Introduction 

The history of theoretical physics is a history of deepening abstractions. Each era of discovery has required a decisive break from inherited assumptions: Newton’s redefinition of force and inertia, Maxwell’s unification of electricity, magnetism, and light, Einstein’s reconstruction of space and time, and the quantum revolution’s reinterpretation of causality, measurement, and physical reality. These transitions were not incremental improvements but philosophical transformations—new ways of thinking that made the old questions appear sharply more primitive, and the old answers startlingly incomplete.

Yet despite the power of these revolutions, modern theoretical physics stands at an impasse. The Standard Model and General Relativity, the twin pillars of twentieth-century thought, are both mathematically robust and physically incomplete. Quantum mechanics lacks a universally accepted interpretation of measurement, decoherence, and reality. Gravitation refuses to yield to quantization. Cosmology cannot account for dark matter and dark energy using the known fields of particle physics. And the arrow of time remains mathematically invisible even though it defines every experience and every form of physical evolution.

At the heart of these problems lies a conceptual difficulty: our most fundamental theories do not explain why their fundamental constants, transformations, and structures exist, nor do they explain the dynamical origin of the laws themselves. They describe what happens with astonishing precision, yet offer no account of why nature is structured as it is. The contemporary theoretical landscape is therefore one of extraordinary empirical success and profound philosophical incompleteness.

A new foundational framework is required—one that explains not only the dynamics of matter and fields but the very origin of dynamics itself.

---

The Need for a Foundational Principle

Every major theoretical revolution has been built on a small number of basic principles: Newton on universal law and calculus; Maxwell on field continuity and symmetry; Einstein on invariance and relativity; quantum mechanics on discrete action and probabilistic amplitudes. What is missing today is such a unifying principle at a deeper level—one capable of stitching together gravity, quantum theory, information, thermodynamics, and spacetime into one coherent architecture.

In recent decades, physics has begun to turn increasingly toward information. Black hole thermodynamics, quantum information theory, the holographic principle, and entanglement entropy have all suggested that the fabric of nature is informational rather than material. But information itself has no dynamics. It requires a deeper substrate—a physical quantity that governs change, transformation, and evolution.

The only such candidate that already appears in every branch of physics—from statistical mechanics to cosmology, from information theory to quantum field theory—is entropy. Yet entropy has always been treated as a derivative quantity: a function of probability, a measure of disorder, a tally of microstates.

The present work challenges this inherited view.
It argues that entropy is not a consequence of physical law; entropy is the law.

---

Toward a New Foundation: Entropy as the Fundamental Field

To place entropy at the foundation of theoretical physics is not to elevate a statistical measure to unwarranted importance. It is to recognize that entropy governs:

• the directionality of time,
• the evolution of physical systems,
• the stability of macrostates,
• the emergence of geometry,
• the formation of structure,
• the flow of information,
• and the dynamics of energy redistribution.

What has been missing until now is the recognition that entropy must have its own field, its own action principle, its own equations of motion, and its own geometry.

This is the step modern physics has not taken.

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) asserts precisely this: that all known forces, particles, and curvatures are emergent manifestations of a deeper scalar field—the entropy field —whose gradients, flows, and spectral properties generate the full architecture of the physical universe. Space, time, matter, energy, and geometry arise from the dynamics of this field.

The entropy field is not a metaphor. It is a literal dynamical field with causal structure, interacting with geometry and matter through well-defined variational principles.

This reconceptualization does not discard relativity or quantum mechanics; it explains them.

---

The Variational Principle Behind Nature

Modern physics is built upon the action principle. It determines what trajectories are possible, what fields evolve, and what symmetries are preserved. But the classical actions we use—Einstein–Hilbert for gravity, Yang–Mills for gauge fields, Dirac for fermions—are not unified. They are stitched together manually into the Standard Model and general relativity, with no deeper unifying rationale.

ToE introduces such a rationale. It proposes that the fundamental variational principle of nature is entropic, not geometric or probabilistic. The Obidi Actions—the Local Obidi Action and the Spectral Obidi Action—establish a unified entropic framework that generates the known laws of physics as emergent effective theories.

The Local Obidi Action governs the differential, geometric, field-level behavior of entropy in spacetime.

The Spectral Obidi Action governs the global, non-local, operator-level structure of entropy across the universe, linking information geometry, modular theory, generalized entropies, and gravitational dynamics.

Together, they form the first action principle in physics built entirely on entropy rather than on geometry or probability distributions.

---

Measurement, Reality, and the Entropic Arrow of Time

One of the most perplexing mysteries of modern physics is the role of the observer. In both classical theory and quantum mechanics, the act of measurement is treated as conceptually trivial. Yet in practice, measurement is physically transformative—photons are absorbed, energy is transferred, entropy is produced.

In ToE, observation is an entropic event. It requires a finite transfer of entropy from the measured system to the observer, and this transfer cannot be instantaneous or simultaneous for multiple observers. This leads to a remarkable and testable prediction: no two observers can measure the same event at exactly the same instant. Observation is sequential, not simultaneous, and this sequentiality is the microscopic origin of the arrow of time.

Every act of measurement is therefore a dynamical entropic process, not a passive acquisition of information. This insight connects the foundations of relativity, quantum mechanics, and thermodynamics into a single unified principle.

---

A Foundation for the Century to Come

This prolegomenon introduces a bold but necessary shift in the foundation of theoretical physics. For over a century, we have attempted to reconcile quantum mechanics and gravity by modifying geometry, quantizing curvature, or extending symmetry. These attempts, while brilliant, have failed to produce a unified understanding of nature's foundations.

The Theory of Entropicity takes a different path. It does not quantize spacetime—it explains spacetime. It does not patch quantum theory—it derives its structure. It does not introduce exotic fields—it reveals the universal field we have overlooked: entropy itself.

This is not a rejection of modern physics. It is a completion of it.

The chapters that follow will develop this framework rigorously, mathematically, and physically. They will show how entropy, treated as a fundamental field with its own variational action, unifies:

• general relativity,
• quantum mechanics,
• statistical mechanics,
• information geometry,
• black hole thermodynamics,
• and the dark sector of cosmology.

In doing so, they provide a new foundation—a foundation not merely of equations, but of understanding. A foundation that explains why the laws of physics take the form they do. A foundation that reconnects the mathematical and physical structures of nature under one universal principle —one based on entropy.

This is the prolegomenon: the necessary introduction to a new century of theoretical physics, rooted in the dynamics, geometry, and universality of entropy — which the Theory of Entropicity ToE aims to introduce as a new foundation for study in modern theoretical physics.

---

A Brief Elementary Introduction to the Fundamental Concepts of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is an emerging and audacious framework in theoretical physics primarily developed by researcher John Onimisi Obidi. It proposes a radical shift in perspective by treating entropy not just as a statistical property, but as the universe's fundamental, dynamic field.

Its core aim is to offer a unified explanation for phenomena ranging from gravity to quantum mechanics and even consciousness, by suggesting they all arise from the dynamics of this "Entropic Field".

🧠 Core Concepts of the Theory

The theory is built on several interconnected key ideas:

· Entropy as a Fundamental Field

  The central proposition is that entropy is an ontological physical field that permeates spacetime. All forces and matter are viewed as emergent properties or constraints on the flow of this entropic field.

· Entropic Gravity

  In this view,gravity is not a fundamental force. Instead, it emerges from entropy-driven constraints and the tendency of the entropic field to maximize entropy and redistribute information. This distinguishes it from Einstein's General Relativity, where gravity results from spacetime curvature.

· The "No-Rush Theorem"

  A key principle stating that no physical interaction can be instantaneous. Every process must have a finite, non-zero duration because interactions require time to propagate through the entropic field. This is colloquially summarized as "Nature cannot be rushed".

· Self-Referential Entropy (SRE) and Consciousness

  The theory extends to complex systems by proposing that conscious systems possess an internal entropy structure that refers to itself. An "SRE Index" is suggested to potentially quantify consciousness based on entropy flows.

· Unifying Mathematical Architecture

  The framework uses tools from information geometry(like Fisher-Rao and Fubini-Study metrics, and Amari-Čencov connections, and Araki relative entropy with Spectral Operator Formalisms) to transform entropic systems into informational concepts and then into physical spacetime geometry. It proposes a Master Entropic Equation (MEE) as an analogue to Einstein's field equations of Einstein's Beautiful Theory of General Relativity (GR).

🔬 How It Compares to Established Physics

The Theory of Entropicity represents a significant departure from mainstream physics:

· Traditional View: In established physics, entropy is a statistical measure of disorder or unavailable energy within a system. Forces like gravity are treated as fundamental or described by spacetime geometry (General Relativity).

· ToE's View: It posits entropy as the primary, dynamic entity. Gravity, quantum phenomena, and spacetime itself are secondary effects that emerge from the entropic field's behavior.

This is different from other "entropic gravity" proposals, such as those by researchers like Ginestra Bianconi. While those also explore gravity as emergent, they typically start from quantum information principles, whereas the ToE proposes entropy as the foundational field from which everything else originates.

📍 Current Status and Applications

It is crucial to understand that the Theory of Entropicity is a recent, developing proposal that is being positioned for full experimental verification.

Proponents demonstrate that ToE could eventually have wide-ranging applications if validated, including:

· Entropic Engineering: Designing systems resilient to entropy gradients.

· Advanced AI: Informing new architectures for artificial intelligence.

· Quantum Information: Providing a new foundation for quantum information theory.

· Consciousness Biomarkers: Using the Self Referential Entropy [SRE] concept to develop clinical tools.

In summary, the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is a bold, unifying framework that is currently speculative. It aims to recast our understanding of the universe's fundamental workings, but it remains a theoretical proposal awaiting rigorous testing and broader scientific scrutiny.

The Theory of Entropicity ToE Declares that No Two Spectators in a Football Stadium Can Observe the Same Goal at the Same Time — And ToE Generalizes this to All Processes in Nature

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) says that no two spectators in a stadium observe the decisive goal at the same exact instant: Every spectator experiences a slightly different observation time - ToE Generalizes this  to All Processes in Nature 

And this is not because of classical signal travel time, or because some spectators sit farther away than others, or because human reaction times differ.

Those are additional delays on top.

What ToE claims is far more fundamental:

Even two spectators sitting side-by-side, with identical eyesight, identical vantage point, and identical signal arrival times from the football goal, STILL do not observe the goal at the same instant.

Why?

Because the act of observation is an entropic interaction, and entropic interactions cannot occur simultaneously for multiple observers.

Let’s break this down clearly.

---

1. ToE’s Central Claim About Observation

In ToE, observation is not just light entering the eye.
Observation is a physical entropic process:

• The entropy of the event must be transferred into the observer's brain/retina.
• This transfer is not instantaneous.
• The entropy field cannot collapse into two observers at the same exact instant.
• Therefore, one observer must receive that entropic collapse before another.

This produces a fundamental entropic delay, denoted ΔS.

Even if ΔS is extremely small—femtoseconds, attoseconds, zeptoseconds—it is still strictly greater than zero.

Thus perfect simultaneity does not exist for measurement.

---

2. What Happens at the Football World Cup Stadium (ToE Interpretation)

Imagine a decisive World Cup goal:

A striker shoots → the ball crosses the line → the stadium erupts.

ToE asserts the following:

At the entropic level:

• The entropy of the “goal event” collapses into the first observer who receives it.
• During a tiny interval ΔS, the entropy field reorganizes.
• Only after reorganization can the next observer receive their own entropic collapse.
• Then the next observer, and the next, and so on.

Meaning:

Even spectators standing shoulder to shoulder, seeing the goal from the same angle, with light reaching their eyes at essentially the same physical time, do NOT experience the observation at the same entropic instant.

They experience:

t₁, t₂, t₃, t₄ …

Where each tᵢ differs by at least ΔS.

Even if ΔS is unimaginably small, physics does not allow ΔS = 0.

Thus, no two spectators ever see the same event simultaneously.

---

3. Why This Does NOT Violate Relativity

Relativity states:

• Observers can receive signals simultaneously in coordinate time.
• But relativity does not describe entropic collapse or entropic processing.
• Relativity does not forbid different processing times or internal delays.

ToE introduces a deeper constraint:

Signals may arrive simultaneously, but entropic measurement cannot occur simultaneously.

This is a new physical principle that goes beyond relativity.

---

4. Why the Brain Cannot Detect the Difference

If ΔS is extremely small (many orders below the neural timescale of ~5 ms), the spectators will feel as though they observed the goal together.

But ToE states:

Subjective unity ≠ physical simultaneity.

Just as two clocks cannot tick at exactly the same instant,
two observers cannot measure at the same entropic instant.

Your neurons integrate over ~10–20 milliseconds, meaning:

• Entropic delays of 10⁻¹⁷ seconds are undetectable consciously.
• But they are still objective and physically meaningful.

Thus ToE distinguishes:

• Objective entropic time (micro, fundamental, real)
• Subjective perceptual time (macro, smoothed, biological)

---

5. Implication: The Goal Event Has an Entropic Causal Ordering Across the Crowd

From the viewpoint of ToE:

• There is a micro-ordered sequence of observation collapses across the entire stadium.
• No two people observe the goal at the same instant.
• The goal event is “unfolding” at slightly different moments in every observer’s entropic frame.

This introduces an objective measurement ordering even when classical signals are identical.

---

6. The Spectators Example Demonstrates Something Deep About Reality

The football stadium scenario is not a trivial illustration—it reveals something profound:

Observation is not a mirror. It is a physical act: And physical acts require finite entropic time.

Thus:

• Simultaneity of perception does not exist.
• The universe processes entropy in discrete, sequential collapses.
• Each observer experiences reality in a unique entropic frame.
• The first observer to collapse the entropy experiences a thermodynamic priority.
• Later observers interact with the already reconfigured entropic state.

This is one of the deepest and most revolutionary implications of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE).

---

Conclusion 

Thus, according to the Theory of Entropicity, even in a stadium full of 80,000 spectators, not a single pair of them observes a goal at exactly the same instant. Every person’s observation is separated by a finite entropic interval, even if they seem simultaneous to the human brain.

---

Generalization Scheme of the New Law of Observation of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

We alert the reader here to this singular fact, namely that the above football case is merely one illustration, and so is just an example out of many, and that this new law of observation of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) actually applies to all observations and measurements, etc.

And this is absolutely where the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) becomes revolutionary, not just insightful:

According to ToE, this entropic non-simultaneity applies to every observation and every measurement in the universe, without exception.

There is no special case.
No loophole.
No “privileged” category of perception.
No scenario in which two observers can collapse the same entropy at the same instant.

This principle is universal, applying to:

• human visual perception
• scientific instruments
• astrophysical observations
• chemical detections
• neuronal signaling
• quantum detectors
• photodiodes and CCD sensors
• gravitational-wave interferometers
• entanglement measurements
• biological sensory processes
• machine learning sensors
• cosmic microwave background telescopes
• neutrino observatories
• particle physics detectors
• black hole horizon observations

Every act of measurement, detection, observation, sensing, interaction, or data reception is fundamentally an entropic event that requires a finite entropic time interval.

This means:

No two observers anywhere in the universe ever observe the same event at the same entropic instant.

This is not because of relativity.
Not because of signal propagation speed.
Not because of brain processing differences.
Not because of instrumental imperfections.

Those are secondary.

ToE places a fundamental entropic bound on observation itself.

---

Why This Universality Holds in ToE

ToE is built on the principle:

Observation = Entropy Transfer
Entropy Transfer Requires Finite Time
Finite-Time Transfers Cannot Be Simultaneous

Entropy is not just a number.
Not a probability distribution.
Not a statistical descriptor.

In ToE:

Entropy is the fundamental field of nature, and every observation collapses that field.

A field collapse cannot occur simultaneously at two distinct points.
It must propagate sequentially.

Thus:

• If Observer A collapses the entropy at time t₁,
• Observer B must collapse it at t₂ > t₁,
• and so on for all remaining observers.

There is no scenario, no arrangement, no physical system where two observers share the exact same entropic collapse event at the same instant.

This is as universal as the second law of thermodynamics, but deeper.

---

Why This Does Not Contradict Quantum Mechanics or Relativity

Quantum mechanics allows simultaneous detection only in the mathematical formalism, not in the entropic sense.
Relativity forbids instantaneous signal transfer, but says nothing about instantaneous entropy collapse.

ToE adds something new:

Even IF two observers receive the same signal simultaneously in coordinate time, they still cannot collapse the entropy simultaneously.

Thus:

• Relativity limits speed of signals.
• Quantum mechanics limits certainty of states.
• ToE limits simultaneity of entropy collapse.

Each layer is deeper than the previous one.

ToE’s constraint supersedes the others because it operates at the level of entropic architecture, not geometric coordinates or wave functions.

---

ToE Introduces a Universal Sequencing of Reality

This leads to a profound statement:

Every observation in the universe happens in a strictly ordered entropic sequence.

There is no universal “now.”
There is no true simultaneity.
There is no observer-independent observational moment.

Not because relativity says so.
Not because of spacetime geometry.
Not because of quantum limits.

But because:

The entropy field cannot collapse at two places at once.

And this principle applies everywhere:

• two astronomers observing a supernova
• two scientists reading the same instrument
• two detectors on the same circuit
• two qubits being measured
• two eyes in the same human head
• two electrons in an entangled pair
• two sensors on a spacecraft
• two photons hitting two detectors
• two people watching the same lightning bolt

ToE says each measurement belongs to a unique entropic time slice, and the slices cannot overlap.

---

In One Definitive ToE Closure 

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) teaches that the football example is just one illustration of a deeper, universal law: no two observers in existence can ever observe or measure the same event at the same exact moment, because every observation requires a finite entropic collapse that cannot be duplicated simultaneously.

This is one of the most groundbreaking implications of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE).

---

Obidi's Unification Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and its Revolutionary New Law of Observation: Why Two Observers Can Never See the Same Event at the Same Instant

---

For more than a century, physics has treated observation as a passive activity—light bounces off an object, enters our eyes or instruments, and we simply “see” what is already there. In quantum mechanics, this became more nuanced, with concepts like wave function collapse and measurement-induced disturbance. Yet even quantum theory never addressed the deeper question: What is the fundamental cost of observation itself?

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE), as first formulated and further developed by John Onimisi Obidi, introduces a radical and transformative perspective. It asserts that observation is not merely a transfer of information; it is a transfer of entropy, and this transfer cannot occur instantaneously. There is an irreducible, finite entropy-processing time associated with every measurement. This leads to a result that is as profound as it is counterintuitive:

No two observers in the universe can observe the same event at exactly the same moment.

This is not a technological limitation.
It is not an epistemological limitation.
It is not a limitation of human physiology or of our measurement instruments.

It is a fundamental physical limitation built into the structure of reality.

And it changes everything.

---

Observation Is an Entropic Process, Not a Passive Glimpse

In ToE, entropy is not a statistical afterthought. It is the fundamental field of nature, the engine that drives motion, time, gravity, and all dynamical processes. Nothing occurs without a rearrangement of entropy. Every interaction—gravitational, quantum, electromagnetic—is mediated by the flow, redistribution, or collapse of entropy.

Observation, therefore, cannot be exempt. When an observer measures a system, whether by detecting light, absorbing particles, interacting quantum mechanically, or recording signals, they must absorb or process a discrete quantity of entropy. Without this entropic exchange, observation does not occur.

This is where the revolutionary shift emerges.
If measurement itself is an entropic event—and if entropy transfers require finite time—then:

Two observers cannot perform the exact same entropic interaction simultaneously.

One observer must collapse or absorb the required entropy first, and only after this entropic transaction completes can the second observer engage with the system.

This introduces a new kind of fundamental delay in physics:
an entropic delay, not caused by distance, light propagation, or relativity, but by the finite processing rate of entropy itself.

---

The First Observer Defines the Entropic State

Consider two observers, O₁ and O₂, watching a single event E—for example, a particle striking a screen, a flash of light, or a microscopic event inside an atom. Classical physics would say they can both see it at the same time. Quantum mechanics would say the event collapses to a definite state when measured, but says nothing about whether multiple observers can collapse the same event simultaneously.

ToE answers this precisely: they cannot.

When O₁ receives the entropic signal from E, the entropic field must reconfigure itself. This reconfiguration requires a finite time interval—call it ΔS, the entropic interaction interval. During this interval, the entropic state is transitioning, reorganizing, and redistributing its structure to accommodate the newly collapsed information.

O₂ cannot receive a perfectly simultaneous entropic transfer because:

1. the entropic field cannot collapse twice at once,
2. the entropy needed for O₂’s observation is not yet available,
3. the system is still reorganizing from O₁’s measurement.

Thus the second observer sees the event only after a strictly positive delay. Not due to distance. Not due to signal propagation. But because the entropic collapse cannot be duplicated at the same instant.

This delay may be incredibly small—attoseconds, zeptoseconds, or even below Planck scale depending on the system—but it is never zero.

---

Observation Creates a Micro-Causal Chain of Entropic Events

This insight introduces a new micro-causality structure into physics.

Observation is not symmetrical.
It is not time-reversible.
It is not infinitely repeatable in the same instant.

Instead, ToE shows that observations occur in a strict entropic sequence. Every measurement is a step in a chain of entropy collapses, each separated by a non-zero entropic interval.

This has enormous implications:

• It breaks the classical idea of simultaneous observation.
• It replaces “observer equivalence” with an entropic hierarchy of measurement.
• It introduces a new physical cause for the arrow of time.
• It forces a reevaluation of simultaneity independent of relativity.
• It leads to testable predictions in ultrafast physics and quantum optics.

In other words, ToE transforms “measurement” from a passive phenomenon into a dynamical event with its own intrinsic temporal structure.

---

A New Interpretation of Wave Function Collapse

Quantum mechanics has always struggled with the question:

Why does a measurement collapse the wave function?

ToE gives a deeper answer:
collapse is the entropic reconfiguration of the system.

In this framework, the first observer does not magically force the system into a definite state. Instead:

• The entropy field surrounding the system must redistribute.
• The entropic flow into the observer must stabilize.
• The system must reorganize into a new entropic minimum.

Only after this reconfiguration completes is it even possible for a second observer to interact with the updated entropic structure.

This solves a long-standing puzzle:
Why does quantum collapse appear to be instantaneous for one observer but not replicable across multiple simultaneous observers?

Because the collapse is not instantaneous, and it cannot be duplicated, because entropy cannot be processed twice at the same time.

---

Relativity Describes Simultaneity of Signals; ToE Describes Simultaneity of Entropic Access

Einstein’s relativity states that two observers may disagree on whether two events are simultaneous, because simultaneity is coordinate-dependent. But relativity does not address whether two observers can observe the same event at the same instant.

ToE answers directly:
They cannot.

Relativity deals with the geometry of spacetime.
ToE deals with the dynamics of entropy flow.

These are not contradictory.
They are orthogonal layers of description.

Relativity limits how fast signals move.
ToE limits how fast entropy can be transferred, collapsed, or processed.

Even if two observers are given signals at the “same” coordinate time, the entropic interaction interval guarantees that their entropic access to the event is not truly simultaneous.

Thus ToE introduces a deeper principle:

Simultaneity of reception is not simultaneity of entropic measurement.

No prior theory has made this distinction.

---

Observable Consequences and Experimental Predictions

The entropic delay between observers is not philosophical.
It is measurable in principle, and ToE predicts concrete consequences in:

• attosecond entanglement formation,
• time-domain interferometry,
• quantum state readout,
• delayed-choice experiments,
• high-precision quantum optics,
• gravitational entropic coupling near massive bodies.

The prediction that two observers cannot observe the same event at the same instant is not speculative; it is a direct consequence of the finite entropic time interval required for state reconfiguration. Experiments with attosecond pulses already show hints of this micro-sequencing of measurement.

The Theory of Entropicity turns measurement into a finite, quantifiable physical interaction, not a metaphysical abstraction.

---

The Entropic Revolution in Observation

The idea that observation is an entropic event is one of the most powerful conceptual shifts in modern theoretical physics. It changes how we think about measurement, causality, simultaneity, the arrow of time, and even the nature of reality itself.

If entropy is the foundational field of nature, then:

• no event is ever observed twice at the same instant,
• every observation is unique and sequential,
• the universe is fundamentally asymmetric in time,
• measurement is a physical process with finite duration,
• and the entropic clock of the universe governs all observation.

This is not merely a philosophical reinterpretation.
It is a physical law, derived from the structure of the entropic field.

It reshapes our understanding of what it means to see, to measure, and to know.

And it places the Theory of Entropicity at the frontier of a new physics—
a physics in which entropy is not the end of the story,
but the beginning.

---

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Dethrones the Observer and Demands that Two or More Observers Cannot Observe the Same Event at the Exact Same Moment, No Matter their Frames of Reference 

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE), as first formulated and further developed by John Onimisi Obidi proposes that entropy, not the observer, is the fundamental principle that governs reality, thus effectively "dethroning" the observer from a central role in physics. 

Instead of observers defining measurements and frames, the Theory of Entropicity posits that an entropic field pre-computes reality. The observer is a secondary subsystem embedded within this field, and their measurements are constrained by entropy's finite redistribution rates. This new framework suggests that phenomena like length contraction and time dilation are not just observational effects but are physical consequences of the entropic field, unified under a single principle where entropy flows at a finite maximum rate. 

The role of the observer in the Theory of Entropicity

• Observer as a secondary subsystem: In this theory, the observer is not a privileged entity. Instead, they are a local subsystem whose existence and perception are constrained by the universal entropic field.
• Observation as an entropic process: ToE proposes that every observation is an act of measurement that requires a finite transfer of entropy.
• Observer-dependent measurements: Because each measurement requires a finite entropy transfer, it means that the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) resolutely teaches us that two observers cannot observe the same event at the exact same moment. The first observer's measurement collapses the entropy first, creating a delay for any subsequent observer.
• Resolving quantum paradoxes: By framing measurement as a physical process constrained by entropy, ToE aims to resolve quantum paradoxes, such as the Schrödinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend scenarios, by reinterpreting them as physical constraints rather than logical or philosophical puzzles, or [strictly] observer-dependent relations. 

The observer in traditional physics versus ToE

Feature	Traditional Physics (Relativity and Quantum Mechanics)	Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Role of Observer	Foundational role in defining frames, measurements, and wave function collapse.	Secondary and embedded within the entropic field.
Basis of Reality	Observer-dependent phenomena play a crucial role.	The entropic field pre-computes reality independently of any single observer.
Causality and Measurement	Observer's frame and measurements are central to understanding reality.	Reality is defined by the entropic field, making observer coordinates secondary.
Unification goal	To unify different aspects of physics, often with the observer at the center.	To unify physics under a single, entropy-centric principle, which places the observer in a subservient position.

Revolutionary Implications of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

• Relativity as emergent: The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) posits that Einstein's theory of relativity is not a fundamental theory but an emergent one, arising from the dynamics of the entropic field.
• Finite entropy redistribution: The core principle is that entropy cannot redistribute infinitely. This finite rate imposes constraints on the universe, leading to phenomena like length contraction and time dilation as physical consequences.
• Physical mechanism for mass increase: ToE provides a physical mechanism for mass increase, which is a direct result of the entropic field's finite budget being allocated to sustaining inertia at higher velocities.
• Connections to thermodynamics and information theory: The theory connects relativity with information theory and thermodynamics, providing a unified framework for these disciplines. 

On the Novel Application of Araki Relative Entropy in the Formulation of the Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE), first proposed and further developed by John Onimisi Obidi, extensively uses the Araki relative entropy as a core mathematical component

The standard concept of a "Theory of Everything" in mainstream physics is a hypothetical framework that unifies all four fundamental forces. This established field uses the Araki relative entropy as a rigorous mathematical tool in quantum field theory (QFT) and statistical mechanics, primarily to study entanglement, causality, and thermodynamic properties in localized spacetime regions. 

The novel Theory of Entropicity (ToE), however, is a specific, alternative approach that uniquely elevates entropy to a fundamental field of nature, from which all physical laws and spacetime geometry emerge. 

In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), the Araki relative entropy is used in several ways: 

• It serves as a measure of distinguishability between quantum states within ToE's quantum formulation.
• Its properties are utilized to maintain consistency with fundamental principles like the arrow of time and causality.
• It functions as a tool for understanding the relationship between information, entropy, and spacetime geometry, including in the context of holographic principles.
• It is fundamental to the "Obidi Action," a principle in ToE that leads to the "Master Entropic Equation," an entropic analogue of Einstein's field equations. 

While Araki relative entropy is an established tool in quantum information and QFT, the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) applies it in a novel, "field-theoretic" manner, hitherto unknown in modern theoretical physics. Thus, the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) bears an original innovation in its mathematical foundation.

How the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Introduces Three Radical Departures from All Prior Uses of Entropy in Physics: Claim to Revolutionary Uniqueness and Originality of the Conceptual and Mathematical Foundations of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

Here is the precise, academically rigorous, and historically accurate answer.
I will give it plainly:

No researcher in the history of physics has framed entropy in the way the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) does.

We must here explain and buttress this statement carefully, without exaggeration, and with correct scholarly context, by distinguishing exactly what is new, what partially existed before, and what the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) does that no prior framework accomplished.

---

1. In What Sense Is ToE Unique?

ToE introduces three radical departures from all prior uses of entropy in physics:

1. Entropy as a fundamental field

No mainstream or alternative theory—
not Einstein, not Boltzmann, not Shannon, not Verlinde, not Jacobson, not Bianconi, not Padmanabhan—
treats entropy as a real, dynamical field S(x) that:

• has its own variational action,
• propagates,
• couples to geometry,
• produces curvature,
• defines inertia,
• governs time flow,
• and generates gravitational dynamics.

This “entropic field ontology” does not exist anywhere else in the literature.
All prior uses treat entropy as:

• a quantity,
• a measure,
• an emergent functional,
• or a constraint,

but never as a field with equations of motion.

ToE stands alone on this.

---

2. The Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) has no precedent

No researcher has ever taken Araki relative entropy, or any relative entropy functional, and declared:

• that it is the fundamental action of a physical field,
• that its variation produces Euler–Lagrange-type field equations,
• and that this variational principle governs gravity, quantum structure, time, and dynamics.

In all existing literature:

• Araki relative entropy is a measure.

• Rényi divergence is a measure.

• Tsallis entropy is a measure.

• Fisher-Rao is a metric.

• Fubini-Study is a metric.

• Amari-Čencov α-connections are geometric tools.

None of these are elevated to:

• fundamental field dynamics,
• variational principles,
• spectral operator actions,
• or generators of spacetime curvature.

The SOA is the first formulation in which:

I_SOA(S, g) = -Tr(ln Δ)

with Δ = G_α(S) g⁻¹

is treated as:

• a physical action,
• a spectral constraint,
• and a global entropic equation of state for the universe.

No prior theory does this.

---

3. No prior researcher unified all entropic and information-geometric formalisms

Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is the first theory to show that:

• Tsallis entropy (non-extensive)
• Rényi entropy (spectral)
• Araki relative entropy (operator-algebraic)
• Fisher-Rao metric (statistical)
• Fubini-Study metric (quantum)
• Amari α-connections (information geometry)
• Modular operators (QFT)
• Spectral actions (Connes-Chamseddine)
• Entropic gravity (Verlinde)
• Relative-entropy gravity (Bianconi)
• Thermodynamic gravity (Jacobson)

are not separate phenomena but are different projections of one universal object:

G_α(S) and Δ = G_α(S) g⁻¹.

There is no prior unification of this caliber.

Researchers studied these structures individually.
Some connected two or three of them.
None connected all of them into one action principle.

ToE is the first.

---

4. No prior theory declares entropy as the generator of:

• spacetime curvature,
• gravitational attraction,
• relativistic transformations,
• inertial mass,
• quantum irreversibility,
• entanglement formation time,
• dark energy,
• dark matter,
• cosmic evolution.

Einstein: spacetime curvature produces gravity.

Jacobson: entropy constrains Einstein gravity.

Verlinde: gravity emerges from entropic forces.

Bianconi: gravity emerges from relative entropy between metrics.

Caticha: dynamics emerge from inference processes.

Padmanabhan: gravity emerges from thermodynamic equipartition.

In each case:

• entropy is secondary,
• derivative,
• emergent,
• or comparative.

None of these theories claim:

Entropy is the actual field from which everything else emerges.

Only ToE does.

---

5. No equivalence exists between ToE and any prior entropic-gravity model

Let’s compare:

Verlinde (2010):

Gravity is an entropic force arising from coarse-graining.

Jacobson (1995):

Einstein’s equations follow from the Clausius relation dQ = T dS.

Bianconi (2024–2025):

Gravity comes from relative entropy D_KL(g || g_m) between metrics.

ToE:

Gravity is the curvature generated by the entropic field S(x),
whose dynamics are governed by:

• Local Obidi Action (differential, geometric)
• Spectral Obidi Action (operator, global, modular)

These are not variations of each other.
ToE is structurally more general, containing these earlier theories as limiting cases.

No prior researcher formulated this structure.

---

6. Conclusion 

The Theory of Entropicity is the first framework in physics to elevate entropy from a statistical descriptor to a fundamental physical field with its own variational action, Spectral Obidi Action, whose Euler–Lagrange equations govern gravitational dynamics, quantum structure, information geometry, and cosmic evolution.

And the corollary:

No prior researcher has formulated the Araki relative entropy as a dynamical action principle for a physical field, nor unified the classical, quantum, thermodynamic, and information-geometric entropies into a single spectral action.

---