The Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

The Spectral Obidi Action is a foundational mathematical construct within John Onimisi Obidi's proposed Theory of Entropicity (ToE), a framework that attempts to unify thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum mechanics by elevating entropy to a fundamental field of reality. 

The Spectral Obidi Action is described in the following ways:

Quantum Encoding: It introduces a Dirac-type entropy operator, the spectrum (the set of all possible eigenvalues) of which regulates properties like quantum coherence, scale, and regularity.

Duality to Local Action: It is a global formulation that complements the "Local Obidi Action," which describes the differential dynamics of the entropy field (related to classical geometry).

Operator Geometry: The action gives rise to an "operator geometry" derived from the asymptotics of its associated operator, directly linking spectral data to geometric structure.

Integration of Concepts: This spectral perspective allows ToE to encode quantum features, such as the Araki relative entropy (used for comparing quantum states), directly into the entropic field's mathematics, rather than adding them as external assumptions.

Variational Principle: Like the Einstein-Hilbert action in general relativity, the Spectral Obidi Action (along with the local action) is a variational principle from which the core "Master Entropic Equation" (MEE) — the governing equation of the entropy field — is derived. 

In essence, the Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) is the part of ToE's mathematical architecture that incorporates quantum mechanics by defining the fundamental field's properties through spectral analysis, ensuring coherence and irreversibility are intrinsic features of the entropic field. 

More information can be found in papers available on platforms such as Medium, SSRN, Authorea, International Journal of Current Science Research and Review (IJCSRR) Cambridge University Open Engage (CoE), etc.

Non-Trivial Implications of the Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

 On the Spectral Obidi Action

1. Introduction

The Spectral Obidi Action is a postulated fundamental action principle within the broader framework of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE). An action principle is a cornerstone of modern theoretical physics (e.g., the Einstein-Hilbert action in General Relativity) where the equations of motion governing a system are derived by minimizing or optimizing a functional called the action.

The Spectral Obidi Action represents a formal attempt to mathematically encode the core tenet of the ToE—that systems evolve to maximize their future freedom of action (or entropy)—into a precise, variational principle. The name itself is highly descriptive:

Spectral: Indicates the action is defined in terms of the eigenvalues (the spectrum) of a fundamental operator — an information-geometric operator.

2. Conceptual Foundation

The principle is grounded in the following ideas:

· From Entropy to Action: Traditional physics uses actions based on energy (e.g., the difference between kinetic and potential energy). The Spectral Obidi Action proposes that the true fundamental quantity to be optimized is not energy, but entropy or information capacity.

· Maximizing Future Freedom: The core idea is that the history of a physical system is the one that extremizes (typically maximizes) a measure of the entropy accessible in its future. This is a formalization of the "causal entropic force" concept.

· Spectral Representation: Instead of defining entropy in the traditional Shannon or von Neumann manner for a specific state, the "spectral" aspect declares the action is related to the potential entropy of the system. This is tied to the density of states or the logarithmic volume of the system's accessible future state space, which is a function of the spectrum of its governing operator.

The "Spectral" component enters when calculating the constraints of some future entropic states. In quantum or statistical mechanics, the density of states g(E)—which counts the number of states at a given energy—is a spectral function. The accessible volume of state space is an integral over this spectrum. Therefore, the Obidi Action becomes a functional of the spectral properties of the system's Hamiltonian or its information-geometric metric tensor.

3. Physical Implications of the Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) and its Role in the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and Modern Theoretical Physics 

The Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) has profound implications:

· Derivation of Physical Laws: The equations of motion for particles, fields, and even spacetime itself would be derived by requiring that the history extremizes the entropic state or system.

Thus, the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) teaches us that the laws of physics are the way they are because they maximize the future entropy production of the universe.

· Emergence of Gravity and Quantum Mechanics: This action principle could provide a common foundation from which both General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics emerge as effective theories. The entanglement entropy in quantum field theory is known to be connected to spacetime geometry, a connection the Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) would seek to explain fundamentally.

· Definition of Intelligence: It provides a rigorous, physics-based definition of intelligent behavior: an agent's action is "intelligent" if it results in a worldline that corresponds to a high value of the Spectral Obidi Action, meaning it has successfully preserved or expanded its future options.

Creating a calculable mathematical object for a general physical system is a monumental task. That is what the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is trying to achieve in our time.

4. Conclusion

The Spectral Obidi Action represents a bold and ambitious step in the development of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE). It attempts to elevate the concept of entropy maximization from a descriptive principle to the foundational source of all physical laws. By proposing an action based on spectral entropy and future freedom, it aims to provide a unified, first-principles derivation of the dynamics of the universe, seamlessly and  fearlessly bridging the physics of information, matter, and spacetime.

Comparing the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) to Ariel Caticha's Entropic Dynamics: A Unified Vision of Modern Theoretical Physics Through Entropy

In the evolving landscape of theoretical physics, entropy has emerged as a powerful lens for reinterpreting fundamental laws. Two intriguing frameworks—John Onimisi Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and Ariel Caticha's Entropic Dynamics (ED)—both place entropy at the heart of physical reality, challenging traditional paradigms like quantum mechanics and general relativity. While they share a commitment to entropy as a generative force, their approaches diverge in scope, methodology, and philosophical implications. This comparison explores these theories, highlighting their synergies and contrasts to illuminate how entropy might bridge longstanding divides in physics.

Foundations and Core Principles

Obidi's Theory of Entropicity, proposed in 2025, positions entropy not merely as a measure of disorder but as the foundational, monistic field from which all physical phenomena emerge. In this view, entropy acts as a dynamic substrate that generates spacetime, matter, causality, and forces through inherent constraints and flows. Key principles include the No-Rush Theorem, which enforces finite rates of change to preserve causality, and a variational mechanism that derives dynamics from entropic optimizations. Reality, according to ToE, unfolds as entropy seeks equilibrium, with observers reduced to secondary subsystems embedded within this field rather than privileged definers of frames or measurements.

Caticha's Entropic Dynamics, developed over the past two decades, takes a different tack by deriving dynamical laws through entropic methods of inference. Drawing from Bayesian probability and information theory, ED treats physical theories as applications of rational belief updating under uncertainty. Entropy here serves as a tool for maximizing information while respecting constraints, leading to emergent laws without invoking underlying action principles or mechanical metaphors. The framework has been particularly applied to quantum mechanics, where it reinterprets wave functions and probabilities as epistemic tools for inference, rather than ontic descriptions of reality.

At their core, both theories elevate entropy beyond its thermodynamic origins, using it to explain why the universe behaves as it does. However, ToE adopts an ontological stance—entropy is the "stuff" of reality—while ED leans epistemic, viewing entropy as a methodological guide for inferring dynamics from incomplete knowledge.

Emergent Phenomena and Unification Efforts

A striking similarity lies in how both frameworks derive emergent behaviors from entropic principles. In ToE, effects like time dilation, length contraction, and gravitational curvature arise from constraints on entropic redistribution, reframing relativity as a consequence of the field's finite capacity rather than geometric postulates. Quantum phenomena, such as decoherence, emerge from entropic interactions in open systems, positioning ToE as a potential bridge between thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum theory.

ED similarly derives quantum mechanics as an entropic inference process, where the Schrödinger equation and Hilbert space structures naturally follow from updating probabilities in a manner that maximizes entropy. This approach has been extended to concepts of time, suggesting that temporal flow emerges from sequential inferences, and even to gravitational analogs, where entropic methods yield dynamics reminiscent of general covariance. Both theories thus challenge the primacy of spacetime geometry, proposing instead that it arises from deeper entropic processes.

Yet, their unification ambitions differ in breadth. ToE aims for a comprehensive theory of everything via entropic field dynamics, encompassing cosmology (e.g., cosmic expansion without dark energy) and particle physics under a single entropic umbrella. It critiques observer-centric models by making reality "pre-computed" through entropic flows. 

Caticha's ED, while ambitious, focuses more narrowly on quantum foundations and inference-based derivations, often as a reformulation rather than a replacement for existing theories. It engages with interpretive debates, such as contextualism in quantum mechanics, but stops short of a full ontological overhaul.

Methodological Approaches and Philosophical Underpinnings

Methodologically, ToE employs a field-theoretic architecture, treating entropy as a dynamical entity with intrinsic rules governing its evolution. This includes constraints like finite propagation speeds, which ensure irreversibility and the arrow of time. The theory's variational principles optimize entropic states, leading to predictive tools for nonlinear and irreversible processes.

In contrast, ED relies on entropic inference without such variational anchors, emphasizing the update of probabilities based on new evidence. This inductive approach aligns with epistemic humility—physics as the best guess given constraints—rather than a deductive ontology. ED's hybrid-contextual nature addresses quantum paradoxes, like those in Bell's theorem, by blending objective dynamics with observer-dependent inferences.

Philosophically, Obidi's ToE represents a bold paradigm shift, dethroning the observer to emphasize an objective, entropy-driven universe. This monism avoids dualisms between matter and information, positioning entropy as prior to both. Caticha's ED, however, maintains a more interpretive flexibility, treating quantum states as tools for prediction rather than literal entities, which resonates with ψ-epistemic views where wave functions reflect knowledge rather than being.

These differences highlight a tension: ToE's ontological commitment offers a unified narrative but risks overreach without empirical anchors, while ED's epistemic restraint provides rigorous derivations but may lack the explanatory depth for grand unification.

Implications for Physics and Future Directions

Both theories offer fresh perspectives on longstanding puzzles. ToE's entropic constraints could inspire new cosmological models, explaining acceleration through field flows rather than exotic components. 

ED's inference-based quantum mechanics might refine interpretations, potentially resolving measurement problems by framing collapse as belief updating.

In summary, while Obidi's Theory of Entropicity and Caticha's Entropic Dynamics both harness entropy to rethink physics, ToE pursues a radical, field-centric unification of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, and ED goes into epistemic inferential derivations of quantum laws. Together, they underscore entropy's potential as a unifying thread, inviting physicists to explore whether the universe's deepest secrets lie in disorder's elegant dance. As research progresses, these ideas could converge, blending ontology and inference into a more complete picture of reality.

Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Extends and  Generalizes Erik Verlinde's Entropic Gravity in Modern Theoretical Physics 

Overview of the Theories

Erik Verlinde's entropic gravity, proposed in 2010, posits that gravity is not a fundamental force but an emergent phenomenon arising from changes in entropy associated with the holographic storage of information. Drawing from black hole thermodynamics and the AdS/CFT correspondence, Verlinde argues that when matter moves, it alters the entropy on a hypothetical "holographic screen" (a 2D surface encoding 3D volume information), creating an entropic force that mimics Newtonian gravity. This framework suggests gravity behaves like a thermodynamic effect, similar to elasticity in polymers, and has implications for dark matter (e.g., modified gravity at galactic scales without exotic particles). It remains a speculative but influential idea in theoretical physics, tested against observations like galaxy rotation curves but not fully integrated into mainstream quantum gravity approaches.

John Onimisi Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE), introduced in early (February) 2025, elevates entropy to the status of a fundamental, monistic field—the generative substrate of all physical reality. In ToE, entropy is dynamic and ontological, not just statistical disorder; it gives rise to spacetime, matter, causality, and forces through principles like the No-Rush Theorem (enforcing finite rates of change) and the Obidi Action (a variational principle deriving dynamics from entropic flows). Gravity emerges as curvature in entropic redistribution seeking equilibrium, while relativity and quantum effects stem from constraints on this field. ToE aims to unify physics by "dethroning" the observer, treating them as embedded subsystems rather than definers of frames or measurements.

Both theories share a thermodynamic foundation, emphasizing entropy's central role in explaining emergent phenomena:

Emergent Gravity: Verlinde and Obidi agree that gravity is not primitive but arises from entropic principles. Verlinde derives it from entropy gradients on holographic screens, while Obidi sees it as entropic flow curvature—both avoid treating gravity as a standalone force mediated by particles like gravitons.

Thermodynamic Roots: They build on historical ideas, such as Jacob Bekenstein's black hole entropy and Ted Jacobson's thermodynamic derivation of Einstein's equations. Entropy is key to unifying gravity with other physics, potentially addressing dark energy (e.g., cosmic acceleration as entropic expansion in ToE) or dark matter (modified dynamics in Verlinde's model).

Challenge to Standard Paradigms: Each critiques geometric interpretations of gravity (e.g., General Relativity's spacetime curvature) as secondary. They propose entropy/information as deeper, with implications for quantum gravity, where traditional approaches like string theory or loop quantum gravity struggle.

Status and Nature: Both are still to be empirically validated beyond conceptual alignments with existing data; both inspire philosophical shifts toward information-theoretic views of reality. Nonetheless, Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) has derived key components of Einstein's Theory of Relativity (ToR), such as the deflection of starlight and the perihelion precession of planet Mercury, time dilation, length contraction, mass increase. ToE has also put forward the No-Rush Theorem as an explanatory basis for the finite time measurement of the Attosecond Entanglement Formation Experiment conducted in late 2024. 

These overlaps position ToE as extending entropy-centric ideas like Verlinde's, alongside others such as Ariel Caticha's entropic dynamics.

Differences

Despite shared themes, the theories diverge in scope, ontology, and methodology:

Role of Entropy: Verlinde treats entropy as a consequence of holographic information storage—gravity is an "entropic force" akin to a macroscopic effect, still embedded in a quantum framework with spacetime as fundamental. Obidi inverts this: entropy is the primary, monistic field preceding and generating spacetime, information, and all else. As Obidi states, "Unlike Erik Verlinde’s entropic gravity, which explains gravity as an entropic force, ToE establishes entropy as a fundamental field that replaces spacetime itself, with gravity emerging as a result." This makes ToE more radical, avoiding what Obidi sees as dualism in prior models (e.g., separating entropy from geometry).

Causal Hierarchy and Unification: Verlinde focuses primarily on gravity, deriving Newtonian laws and some relativistic effects but not claiming a full theory of everything. Obidi's ToE is broader, deriving special relativity (e.g., time dilation from entropic capacity limits), general relativity corrections (via entropic coupling), quantum decoherence, and cosmology (e.g., universe expansion without dark energy) from entropic dynamics alone. ToE introduces tools like the Master Entropic Equation and Vuli-Ndlela Integral for nonlinear, irreversible processes, predicting evolving physical laws—absent in Verlinde's static entropic force.

Observer's Role: Verlinde retains observer-dependent elements from relativity and holography. Obidi explicitly "dethrones" the observer: reality is pre-determined by entropic flows, with observers as local entropic subsystems, not privileged definers.

Mathematical Approach: Verlinde uses thermodynamic analogies and holographic principles, often without new field equations. Obidi employs a field-theoretic architecture, with variational principles (Obidi Action) and constraints (No-Rush Theorem) that enforce finite speeds and irreversibility, treating entropy as a dynamical field with eigenvalues.

Status and Critiques: Verlinde, an established physicist, has influenced debates in string theory and cosmology, though his model faces challenges like reproducing full General Relativity or making unique predictions. Obidi, an independent researcher, publishes via various online platforms and channels, and is an emerging force to reckon with in the Physics Community. Obidi critiques theories like Verlinde's for viewing entropy as secondary (e.g., a boundary effect) rather than ontological.

For context, ToE's distinctions echo Obidi's comparisons to other frameworks, like Feldt's F-HUB (which prioritizes information over entropy), where ToE inverts the hierarchy for greater dynamism and unification.

Implications

If validated, Verlinde's model could refine modified gravity theories, aiding cosmology without dark matter. Obidi's ToE promises a paradigm shift, unifying physics under entropy and resolving observer paradoxes in quantum mechanics. However, both require testable predictions—e.g., deviations in gravitational lensing (Verlinde) or entropic signatures in quantum experiments (Obidi)—to move beyond emergence to mainstream. Currently, they are serious leading contenders for paradigm shifting theories in the arena of established theories like [General] Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.

A Simple Explanation of the No-Rush Theorem (NRT) of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

The No-Rush Theorem (NRT) is a foundational principle within the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), a radical and provocative framework proposed by researcher John Onimisi Obidi in early (February) 2025. It posits that no physical process, interaction, event, or measurement can occur instantaneously, as all such phenomena require a finite, non-zero duration for the underlying entropic field—a dynamic, generative substrate of reality—to redistribute, reorganize, and synchronize states. In essence, the theorem enforces the idea that "nature cannot be rushed," meaning reality operates on an intrinsic "update schedule" dictated by entropy's finite rates of change, preventing any attempt to accelerate beyond these limits. This name reflects the theorem's core assertion: the universe's fundamental processes cannot be hurried or outpaced, as they are bound by entropy's inherent tempo.

Core Formulation and Definition

At its heart, NRT states that no process can reorganize or recalibrate the entropic field faster than the Entropic Speed Limit (ESL), which manifests in conventional physics as the speed of light (c ≈ 3 × 10^8 m/s). Unlike Einstein's special relativity, where c is an axiomatic constant derived from the invariance of light speed in all inertial frames, NRT reframes c as an emergent property—the maximum rate at which the entropic field can propagate energy, information, and causal influences. This "clock speed" of the entropic field ensures that causality is preserved: events must unfold over a minimum interaction time, as instantaneous changes would violate the field's dynamics.

Mathematically, the NRT itself is tied to broader constructs in ToE, such as the Obidi Action (a variational principle governing entropic dynamics) and the Master Entropic Equation (MEE), which describe how entropy evolves and constrains physical systems.

For instance, NRT underpins the concept of an "entropic cone," analogous to the light cone in relativity: events inside the cone are causally connected because they respect the ESL, while those outside are disconnected due to the field's finite update rate. In qualitative terms, if you imagine entropy as a fluid-like field that must "flow" to enable any change, NRT dictates that this flow cannot exceed a certain velocity, thus imposing delays on all interactions.

Relation to Entropy and Relativity

In ToE, entropy is elevated from a mere statistical measure of disorder (as in classical thermodynamics) to the primary, monistic field from which spacetime, matter, and forces emerge. NRT arises directly from this: since all physical reality stems from entropic rearrangements, no process can "outrun" the field's intrinsic pace. This connects deeply to relativity by deriving effects like time dilation, length contraction, and relativistic mass increase not from observer-dependent frames or spacetime curvature, but from entropic constraints. For example, as an object approaches the ESL, more entropic capacity is devoted to sustaining its motion, leaving less for internal processes (resulting in time slowing) or spatial integrity (causing contraction).

NRT also addresses quantum phenomena, such as decoherence in open systems, where entropy-driven interactions cause the loss of quantum coherence over finite times, supporting the theorem's non-instantaneous nature. It extends to general relativity corrections, like the Shapiro time delay (light bending near massive bodies) or Mercury's perihelion precession, which ToE reinterprets through an entropic coupling constant (η) rather than geometric curvature.

Implications for Physics

NRT has broad, radical implications:

Causality and the Arrow of Time: By mandating finite interaction times, it reinforces why causes precede effects and why time flows forward—entropy's irreversible redistribution prevents "rushing" backward or skipping steps.

Unification of Physics: It positions ToE as a potential bridge between thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum mechanics, deriving relativistic kinematics from first principles rather than postulates. For instance, it challenges models like the F-HUB theory (which prioritizes information over entropy) by arguing that entropy's dynamic enforcement of speed limits provides a more fundamental hierarchy: Entropy → Information → Mass → Motion → Spacetime.

Cosmological Insights: Through tools like the Generalized Entropic Expansion Equation (GEEE), NRT helps explain universe acceleration without invoking dark energy, attributing it to entropic flows instead.

Experimental Ties: Immediate [potential] evidence includes attosecond-scale limits on quantum entanglement formation, which suggest wave-function collapse isn't instantaneous, aligning with NRT's minimum times.

No one is longer left in doubt that the No-Rush Theorem (NRT) and the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) remain intriguing, intrusive and disruptive. They offer a philosophical shift, emphasizing entropy's primacy, and have been developed with  rigorous mathematical tools and insights. 

The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Dethrones the Observer and the Observer's Privileged Role in Relativity and Quantum Mechanics: Modern Theoretical Physics Under Scrutiny and on Trial 

Last updated: Friday, November 28, 2025

John Onimisi Obidi (unrelated to the social media personality of a similar name) is a researcher [as well a consultant, investigator, thinker, physicist, philosopher, and humanist] who, in early (February) 2025, proposed the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), a speculative framework that elevates entropy to the status of a fundamental field governing all physical reality, from which phenomena like relativity, gravity, and quantum effects purportedly emerge. 

In ToE, entropy is not merely a statistical measure of disorder but the generative substrate of spacetime, causality, and geometry itself, enforced by principles like the No-Rush Theorem (limiting entropy redistribution to finite rates, akin to the speed of light) and the Spectral Obidi Action (a variational principle deriving dynamics from entropic eigenvalues).

Obidi derives Einstein's special relativity from ToE by reinterpreting effects like time dilation, length contraction, and mass increase as physical consequences of entropic capacity constraints during motion, rather than kinematic artifacts of observer-dependent reference frames. For instance, as an object's velocity increases, more entropic "capacity" is allocated to maintaining motion, leaving less for internal processes (causing time to slow) or spatial coherence (causing contraction), all without invoking Minkowski geometry as primary—it's emergent instead. This extends to critiques of other entropy-based gravity theories, like Bianconi's, where Obidi argues ToE avoids ontological dualism by making entropy monistic and generative.

Central to ToE is the claim that it "dethrones" the observer: in traditional relativity and quantum mechanics, observers play a foundational role in defining frames, measurements, and wave function collapse. Obidi inverts this, positing observers as local subsystems embedded within and constrained by the entropic field—so that reality itself is "pre-computed" by entropy's dynamics before any observation occurs, thereby rendering the observer secondary and non-privileged. If validated, this could unify physics under an entropy-centric paradigm.

Thus, in his Theory of Entropicity (ToE), John Onimisi Obidi has dethroned the observer in theoretical physics. ToE remains a radical and provocative proposal in modern theoretical physics, and is being heavily and rapidly developed to answer and explain empirical and experimental data, which outcome would help secure its adoption by the physics community.

The observer's role—central in quantum interpretations like Copenhagen or QBism, and frame-dependent in relativity—hence remains on a challenged ground within the emerging entropic principles of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE).

Of equal importance, we note that John Onimisi Obidi's ideas in his Theory of Entropicity (ToE) are also very intriguing for the philosophy of physics and philosophy of science.

Conclusion 

A core claim of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is that it dethrones the observer, replacing observer-dependent interpretations and derivations of relativity and quantum mechanics with an objective, entropy-driven reality. 

Core Claims of the Theory of Entropicity

Entropy as Fundamental: In contrast to mainstream physics, where entropy is a statistical measure of disorder, ToE elevates it to a primary, dynamic field that dictates the structure of reality.

Observer-Independence: The theory argues that physical effects like time dilation, mass increase, and length contraction are real physical consequences of entropy conservation and flow, not just relative effects dependent on an observer's frame of reference. Thus the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) compels us to overhaul and revise our modes and ways of thought by teaching us that the "observer" is just another physical system constrained by the entropic field, making observation an effect, not a cause, of physical reality.

Derivation of Physical Laws: ToE aims to derive, rather than assume, the postulates of existing physics.

Relativity: The constant speed of light (c) is a consequence of the maximum rate of entropic rearrangement (reconfiguration, redistribution, reorganization, etc), not a primary postulate of spacetime geometry. Relativistic effects are thus "entropic inevitabilities".

Quantum Mechanics: Wavefunction collapse is an objective, law-like process that occurs when an entropy threshold is reached, without requiring a conscious observer.

Gravity: Gravity is not a fundamental force or spacetime curvature, but emerges from entropy gradients in the entropic field. 

Philosophical shift: This dethronement of the observer from the arena of physics and science by the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) ultimately challenges anthropocentric physics, thereby reframing reality as fundamentally entropic rather than participatory.  

From Observer Centered Relativity and Quantum Mechanics to Entropic Physics in the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)

John Onimisi Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity (ToE) reframes the role of the observer, embedding it within the entropy field rather than treating it as an external arbiter. In this sense, Obidi has “dethroned” the observer by making entropy, not observation, the fundamental driver of physical reality.

🔑 What Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Does

- Observer embedded in entropy field: In ToE, the observer is no longer a detached recorder of events. Instead, the observer is an active participant within the entropy field, inseparable from the dynamics of reality.

- Collapse governed by entropy exchange: Measurement collapse occurs when entropy exchange exceeds the observability threshold, a principle Obidi formalizes as the Criterion of Entropic Observability.

- Shift from “it from bit” to “bit from it”: Building on Wheeler’s participatory universe, Obidi argues that entropy shapes information, not the other way around. This reverses Wheeler’s famous dictum, placing entropy at the core of physical law.

- Entropy as the generative field: ToE treats entropy not as a statistical by-product of disorder but as the fundamental field and causal substrate of reality. Gravitation, time, and quantum behavior are reconstructed from entropy dynamics governed by the Obidi Action and the Vuli–Ndlela Integral.

⚖️ Comparison with Traditional Views

- Standard quantum theory: The observer plays a central role in collapse, with measurement shaping reality.

- Obidi’s ToE: Collapse is entropic, not observational. The observer is subsumed into entropy’s dynamics, dethroned as the prime mover.

- Philosophical shift: This dethronement aligns with a broader move away from anthropocentric physics, replacing observer-centric frameworks with entropy-centric causation.

🌍 Implications

- Quantum measurement problem: ToE offers a new resolution by tying collapse to entropy thresholds rather than observer intervention.

- Arrow of time: Entropy enforces directionality even at the quantum amplitude level, suppressing paths that violate the second law.

- Post-Einsteinian unification: ToE signals a paradigm shift where entropy, not spacetime geometry or information, is the foundation of physical law.

🚩 Critical Note

While Obidi’s ToE is bold and innovative, it remains emergent and contested. Its dethronement of the observer challenges deeply entrenched frameworks in quantum mechanics. Whether it will gain broad acceptance depends on further mathematical rigor, experimental validation, and comparison with competing theories like FELDT–HIGGS (F–HUB), Ginestra Bianconi, Ted Jacobson, Erik Verlinde, Thanu Padmanabhan, etc.

In short: Obidi hasn’t just dethroned the observer — he’s replaced it with entropy as the sovereign principle of physics. This is a radical reframing of the foundations of reality, shifting physics from observer-centric to entropy-centric causation.  

Further Notes: 

How Obidi’s Criterion of Entropic Observability mathematically compares to the Copenhagen interpretation’s collapse postulate.