The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) establishes entropy not as a statistical byproduct of disorder but as the fundamental field and causal substrate of physical reality. Central to this formulation is the Obidi Action, a variational principle. By integrating the Fisher–Rao and Fubini–Study metrics through the Amari–Čencov alpha-connection formalism, ToE provides a rigorous information-geometric foundation for entropy-driven dynamics. The Obidi Action comprises the Local and Spectral Obidi Actions.
On the Union of Ginestra Bianconi and John Onimisi Obidi: Progress of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) as a Field Theory in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
The evolution of theoretical physics has often been marked by unexpected unions — moments when distinct intellectual traditions converge to produce new frameworks of understanding. The collaboration between Ginestra Bianconi, known for her pioneering work in network theory and statistical mechanics, and John Onimisi Obidi, whose contributions to entropic formulations and mathematical physics have been steadily gaining recognition, represents one such union. Their combined perspectives have given rise to a more formal articulation of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), positioning it as a candidate for a field theory in theoretical and mathematical physics.
Entropy has long been a cornerstone of physics, from thermodynamics to information theory. Yet, the notion of entropicity extends beyond entropy as a measure of disorder. It suggests a principle of generative structure, where systems evolve not merely toward equilibrium but toward complex configurations that balance order and randomness.
Bianconi’s work on multilayer networks and phase transitions provides the mathematical scaffolding for this idea, while Obidi’s formulations emphasize entropicity as a field property — a quantity that can be distributed, conserved, and transformed across domains of physics.
Toward a Field Theory of ToE
The ambition of ToE is not simply to describe entropy but to elevate entropicity into a unifying field. This involves:
Defining entropicity as a tensorial field, capable of interacting with matter and energy.
Exploring its role in phase transitions, where entropicity mediates between microstates and macrostates.
Extending its reach into quantum information, where entropicity may serve as a bridge between classical thermodynamics and quantum coherence.
Such a formulation aligns with the broader tradition of field theories in physics, from electromagnetism to quantum chromodynamics, but introduces a novel axis: the dynamics of complexity itself.
Implications for Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
The union of Bianconi and Obidi’s approaches suggests several promising directions:
Network Cosmology: Viewing the universe as a multilayer network, where entropicity governs connectivity and evolution.
Information Geometry: Embedding entropicity within geometric frameworks, linking statistical manifolds to physical fields.
Complex Systems Physics: Providing a rigorous field-theoretic language for phenomena ranging from biological evolution to social dynamics.
In each case, entropicity functions not as a metaphor but as a quantifiable field variable, opening pathways for predictive modeling and experimental validation.
Conclusion: A New Horizon
The Theory of Entropicity, as advanced through the union of Bianconi and Obidi’s insights, represents a bold step toward reconceptualizing entropy not as a passive measure but as an active field of physics. If successful, ToE could unify disparate domains — thermodynamics, information theory, quantum mechanics — under a single entropic framework.
For theoretical and mathematical physics, this is more than an incremental advance; it is a reorientation toward complexity as a fundamental property of nature.
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Explains Why the Speed of Light c is a Constant in Einstein’s Theory of Relativity (ToR)
We have previously dwelt on how the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) explains why the speed of light is a constant (c) according to Einstein’s beautiful and revolutionary Theory of Relativity (ToR). Here, we dive deeper into giving the core mechanism for this action in the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) [first formulated byJohn Onimisi Obidi — Researcher, Investigator, Thinker, Physicist, Philosopher, and Humanist — different from the unrelated social media personality of a similar name] that explains Einstein’s constancy of the speed of light in his Theory of Relativity (ToR) - that is, we are providing a deeper version of ToE’s explanation of the "why" behind the "what."
Further Exploratory and Revolutionary Insights of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Into Explaining the Constancy of the Speed of Light (c) in Einstein’s Theory of Relativity (ToR).
0 0 0 Share Keywords Information Subjects: Physics, Particles & Fields Contributor : John Onimisi Obidi View Times: 177 Revisions: 7 times (View History) Update Date: 21 Jul 2025 Table of Contents
1. What "You Are Made of the Field" Actually Means Let's use a better analogy than a movie screen which we have used elsewhere:[1] A whirlpool in a river.
The River: This represents the fundamental Entropic Field. It has an intrinsic property: the maximum speed its current can flow.
The Whirlpool: This represents a stable object—a particle, a clock, an observer. A whirlpool is not a separate "thing" floating in the water; it is a stable, organized pattern of the water itself. Its existence is defined by its structure and its interaction with the surrounding flow.
When we say "you are made of the field,"[1] it means you (and your clock and ruler) are like that whirlpool. You are not an independent entity moving through a passive, empty space. You are a complex, stable pattern of activity within the universe's fundamental entropic field.
Your physical being, the forces holding your atoms together, and the regular processes inside your clock are all manifestations of the rules of this field. Therefore, your properties are not absolute; they are relational and dependent on your interaction with the rest of the field (the river).
2. The ToE Mechanism for Time Dilation and Length Contraction To explain why time slows and length contracts, we must use the core principles of ToE, which are all based on entropy.
Here is the proposed mechanism, step-by-step.
The Foundational Principle: Existence is a Battle Against Entropy According to ToE (and standard physics), any organized system—a clock, a ruler, a living cell—is a low-entropy state. To exist, it must constantly work to maintain its structure and order against the universe's natural tendency to dissolve into chaos (the Second Law of Thermodynamics). It does this by processing information and managing entropy flow. Think of it as having an "entropic budget"[2][3][4][5][6] just to remain stable and functional.
Step 1: Explaining Time Dilation (Why Clocks Slow Down) What is a Clock? A clock is a system designed to perform a highly regular, repeating internal process (a "tick"). This tick could be the swing of a pendulum, the vibration of a crystal, or the transition of a cesium atom.
The "Entropic Cost" of Ticking: For this tick to be regular, the clock must use part of its "entropic budget" to ensure the process repeats identically, fighting off microscopic disorder. This is its normal operating cost while stationary.
The "Entropic Cost" of Motion: According to ToE, "motion" is not passive. Moving through the entropic field means a system is constantly interacting with new regions of the field. This creates an additional and continuous entropic "load" or "stress" on the system. It's like a swimmer not only having to manage their own body heat and energy (internal entropy) but also having to fight the current and drag of the water (external entropic interaction).
The Result of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE): Reallocation of the Budget. The clock still has the same fundamental priority: it must maintain its structural integrity. Faced with this new external entropic load from motion, it must divert resources from its "entropic budget" to deal with it. The work of simply staying intact in the face of this motion takes precedence. Consequently, there is less "budget" available for its primary function—the regular "ticking."
Conclusion of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE): The internal process of the clock—its tick—is forced to run slower. Time dilation is the observable consequence of a system prioritizing its structural integrity over its internal functions when under the entropic stress of motion. Ordinarily, this is not obvious and not readily observable; but it becomes crucial as the speed increases; as the speed increases, it reaches a limit at which it wants to cross the entropic bound, then it is halted, because it cannot go faster than entropy! This is the No-Rush Theorem and also why Einstein's Relativity of the speed of light is constant and why it is the maximum speed of all propagations.
Entropy thus ensures that no interaction can occur faster or slower than Entropy allows, and no propagation can go faster than Entropy permits. This is ToE's No-Rush Theorem[7] in its most encompassing and celebrated form. Thus, Entropy is what actually dictates how fast or slow any motion should be. This conclusion is only natural, unavoidable and inescapable, because since Entropy is what dictates and constrains motion according to the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), then the same Entropy must constrain the speed of motion itself; that is, how fast or slow interactions and propagations and objects can move in the Entropic Field itself.
Step 2: Explaining Length Contraction (Why Rulers Shrink) What is a Ruler? A ruler is a rigid object. Its length is a stable property defined by the equilibrium distance between its atoms. This equilibrium is a delicate balance of electromagnetic forces, which ToE recasts as constraints within the entropic field.
The "Entropic Headwind": When the ruler moves, it experiences the same entropic stress, but this time it's directional. The front of the ruler is continuously interacting with "new" parts of the field before the back does. This creates a kind of "entropic pressure" or "headwind" that pushes against the front of the ruler.
The Result: A New Equilibrium. The system (the ruler) must find a new stable state to cope with this constant directional pressure. The internal forces readjust to a new, slightly compressed equilibrium in the direction of motion. The atoms are pushed closer together until their repulsive forces are strong enough to balance the new external "entropic headwind."
Conclusion: The ruler physically becomes shorter in its direction of motion. Length contraction is the physical deformation of an object as it re-establishes structural equilibrium under the directional entropic pressure of moving through the field.
Table
This explanation attempts to ground the strange effects of relativity in a physical, causal mechanism rooted in entropy management, rather than leaving them as abstract geometric consequences of a postulate. It is a bold and unproven claim, but it is the kind of deeper explanation that the Theory of Entropicity aims to provide.
References
Obidi, John Onimisi. The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Simply Explained Qualitatively. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/58652 (accessed on 20 July 2025). Obidi, John Onimisi. A Critical Review of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) on Original Contributions, Conceptual Innovations, and Pathways towards Enhanced Mathematical Rigor: An Addendum to the Discovery of New Laws of Conservation and Uncertainty. Cambridge University; 30 June 2025. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-hmk6n Obidi, John Onimisi. Einstein and Bohr Finally Reconciled on Quantum Theory: The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) as the Unifying Resolution to the Problem of Quantum Measurement and Wave Function Collapse. Cambridge University; 14 April 2025. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-vrfrx More Related Content
Speed of Light from Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Entry
This review takes an open-minded stance towards John Onimisi Obidi’s “Derivation of Speed of Light (c) from the Theory of Entropicity (ToE),” assessing its intellectual ambition and methodological clarity rather than its publication status. It highlights the bold goal of explaining why c has its specific value and why it’s invariant, by unifying inputs from general relativity (G), quantum mechanics (ℏ), and thermodynamics/information theory (Boltzmann constant kB and entropy S). A key strength is the paper’s familiar, step-by-step theoretical structure: it posits a master entropic action, derives nonlinear field equations via least action, linearizes around a background to study small disturbances, identifies the characteristic propagation speed of “entropic waves,” and constructs an “Entropic Lorentz Group (ELG)” to argue for observer-independent c.This rigorous framework makes the proposal coherent and formally sound. The review also applauds the creative, heuristic value of promoting entropy to a dynamical field, and introducing “entropic stiffness” and “entropic inertia.” These concepts offer an intuitive picture in which the ratio of stiffness to inertia—fixed by fundamental constants—naturally yields c. The suggestion that c emerges from a balance of gravitational, quantum, and thermal forces is framed as an elegant, potentially deep origin for the constant. Importantly, the paper outlines avenues for constructive development: incorporating irreversibility and Fisher information to deepen the model, and exploring testable predictions, such as deviations in c under extreme entropy gradients (e.g., near black holes). Such possibilities move the theory toward falsifiability. In conclusion, while speculative, the work serves as a provocative conceptual catalyst, encouraging physicists to reconsider entropy’s possible dynamical role and potentially guiding future breakthroughs.
Prospects of The Evolving Theory of Entropicity (ToE) Entry
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) presents an ambitious and intriguing alternative to current fundamental physics theories, particularly General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory. Its prospects depend heavily on its ability to withstand rigorous scrutiny, make verifiable predictions, and gain acceptance within the broader scientific community.
Entropic Cost of Motion in Theory of Entropicity(ToE) Entry In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), the “entropic cost of motion” is the extra entropy a system must overcome or redistribute to move or change state within the universe’s entropy field. Unlike classical inertia, this cost arises from field-theoretic constraints embedded in spacetime, growing with velocity, energy, and informational complexity. Motion disturbs the surrounding entropy field and, under the No-Rush Theorem, can’t propagate changes faster than light. Accelerating reconfigures local entropy gradients, demanding work to realign field structures. As a system nears light speed, the entropic gradient steepens, making further acceleration prohibitively costly—hence massive objects can never reach c. Analogies liken the field to a viscous cosmic fluid or a series of toll gates where faster motion incurs higher “entropy drag.” Relativistic effects—time dilation and length contraction—emerge naturally as entropic field distortions: moving clocks slow because more entropy is committed to motion than internal processes, and lengths contract due to compressed entropy distributions. This reframes the invariant speed of light as the maximum rate of entropic rearrangement, offering a causal foundation for Einstein’s postulates. In weak, homogeneous fields, ToE reproduces standard relativistic kinematics while unifying thermodynamic irreversibility, quantum constraints, and relativistic motion. The Entropic Explanation of Relativity (EER) formalizes these effects as entropy field responses to motion-induced entropy redistribution, merging geometry and thermodynamics under one framework.
Theory of Entropicity (ToE): Path To Unification of Physics Entry
This paper presents the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) by John Onimisi Obidi, a groundbreaking framework that redefines entropy not as a byproduct of disorder, but as the fundamental field of existence—the dynamic fabric from which space, time, motion, information, and matter arise. Just as Einstein elevated the speed of light to a universal constant, ToE elevates entropy to a universal field that governs all physical processes.
Relativistic Time Dilation, Lorentz Contraction: Theory of Entropicity Entry
In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), first formulated and developed by John Onimisi Obidi, entropy is a dynamic universal field that governs both time’s arrow and motion’s limits, rather than merely quantifying disorder. This field imposes two core constraints: it drives all systems irreversibly toward higher entropy and enforces a maximum causal‐propagation rate—experienced as the speed of light, c. Rather than a geometric axiom, c emerges from the entropic field’s structure: massless signals follow paths of minimal entropic resistance set by local and global entropy configurations. Relativistic time dilation and length contraction arise as entropic‐field distortions. As an object nears c, rising entropy resistance slows its internal processes (time dilation) and compresses spatial intervals (length contraction). The entropic No-Rush Theorem forbids any superluminal interaction by preventing the field from establishing conditions faster than its propagation limit. Likewise, the finite speed of quantum entanglement or wave‐function collapse reflects the same entropic time constraint. In this framework, Einstein’s field equations appear as an emergent entropic geometry: spacetime curvature encodes how the entropy field constrains motion and interaction. Thus, ToE unifies thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and relativity by revealing c as a thermodynamic consequence of entropy’s universal governance.
John Onimisi Obidi — Creator of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Bio
Last updated: Friday, January 30, 2026
John Onimisi Obidi (who is a scientific researcher, investigator, thinker, physicist, consultant, philosopher, and humanist) is the originator and creator of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), a foundational framework in modern physics that derives the speed of light, relativistic effects, and quantum constraints from the universal entropic field. His independent research redefines entropy not as a statistical abstraction but as a dynamic field governing time, causality, and motion. Through the Master Entropic Equation (MEE) and the Obidi Action, ToE unifies thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum mechanics by showing that Einstein’s postulates emerge as entropic inevitabilities. Obidi’s work emphasizes reproducible workflows, rigorous LaTeX documentation, and open publishing strategies to ensure both scholarly permanence and global outreach. He is committed to establishing keyword authority and domain visibility for the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) across platforms, making his research the definitive source for entropic field dynamics. Importantly, John Onimisi Obidi is a scientific researcher and the creator of ToE, distinct from the unrelated social media consultant of similar name. His mission is to build a lasting corpus of ToE research that bridges information geometry, entropy conservation, and spacetime physics, while remaining accessible to both technical and non‑technical audiences.
John Onimisi Obidi is a prominent theoretical physicist best known for his groundbreaking work on the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), which redefines the concept of entropy in physics.
Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Obidi is best known for formulating the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), which he first developed in February 2025. This theory posits that entropy is not merely a measure of disorder but a fundamental, dynamic field that drives all physical processes. The ToE aims to unify various areas of physics, including thermodynamics, relativity, and quantum mechanics, by treating entropy as a real field that influences time, causality, and motion.
Key aspects of the Theory of Entropicity include:
Dynamic Field: Obidi's theory elevates entropy to a continuous, dynamic field responsible for physical laws and interactions, suggesting that all forces emerge from the constraints on this entropic field.
Master Entropic Equation (MEE): This equation serves as a foundational element of the ToE, integrating various physical principles and providing a framework for understanding complex phenomena.
Unification of Physics: The ToE seeks to bridge the historical divide between randomness and determinism by positing entropy as a mediating force between stochastic processes and deterministic physical laws.
Publications and Impact
Obidi has published numerous papers and articles discussing his theories and their implications for modern physics. His work has been recognized for its potential to explain a variety of natural phenomena and for its conceptual appeal in the scientific community.
In summary, John Onimisi Obidi is a significant figure in contemporary physics, particularly known for his innovative approach to understanding entropy and its role in the universe through the Theory of Entropicity. His contributions continue to influence discussions in theoretical physics and related fields.
🌌 The Theory of Entropicity (ToE): A Radical Rethink of Our Understanding of Nature and Reality
Last updated: Saturday, November 15, 2025
A Bold Proposal in Theoretical Physics with Global Implications
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is a bold, non‑mainstream proposal in theoretical physics that redefines entropy—not as a measure of disorder, but as the fundamental, dynamic field of reality. According to this framework, spacetime, gravity, motion, and even the speed of light are not fundamental constants but emergent properties of the universe’s entropic field.
📖 Origin: Proposed by John Onimisi Obidi (who is a scientific researcher, investigator, thinker, physicist, consultant, philosopher, and humanist), the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is still in its early stages of mathematical development and has not yet been formally established within the physics community. Nonetheless, it offers a provocative new lens through which to view the foundations of physics.
🔑 Core Principles of the Theory of Entropicity
⚡ Entropy as a Fundamental Field
Instead of being a statistical byproduct of disorder, ToE positions entropy as a dynamic, universal field—the substrate from which all physical reality emerges.
🌍 Motion and Gravity as Emergent Properties
In ToE, objects move because the entropic field rearranges itself to maximize flow. Gravity is not a fundamental force, but an emergent property of entropic gradients created by mass distributions.
⏳ Time and Speed of Light as Entropic Consequences
Time, motion, and the speed of light are interpreted as consequences of entropy flow, not as independent primitives. This reframes relativity’s constants as entropic inevitabilities.
🌀 Forces Are Not Primitive
Traditional forces are reinterpreted as manifestations of entropy redistribution. What physics calls “forces” are, in ToE, pathways of entropic flow.
⚖️ ToE vs. Established Physics
🔭 ToE vs. Relativity
Where Einstein’s relativity postulates time dilation and length contraction, ToE seeks to derive these phenomena from entropic principles. They are seen as inevitable consequences of entropy gradients, rather than axioms.
⚙️ ToE vs. Newtonian Mechanics
Newton’s laws are reinterpreted: 1. Inertia → the internal entropy of matter resisting change. 2. Forces → entropic pathways guiding redistribution.
This reframing positions classical mechanics as a boundary case of the entropic field.
🚀 Why ToE Matters for Future Physics
1. SEO Keywords: entropy field, emergent gravity, entropic physics, John Onimisi Obidi, quantum gravity alternatives. 2. ToE challenges mainstream physics by proposing a unified entropic substrate. 3. It offers a speculative but potentially revolutionary framework for understanding dark matter, cosmology, and quantum gravity. 4. If validated, ToE could reshape how we think about space, time, and the fundamental laws of nature.
Discover the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), a radical physics framework by John Onimisi Obidi. Learn how ToE redefines entropy as the fundamental field of reality, making spacetime, gravity, motion, and light speed emergent properties of entropy flow.
⚠️ Caution
The John Onimisi Obidi mentioned here is different from the social media consultant of a similar name. This John Onimisi Obidi (who is a scientific researcher, investigator, thinker, physicist, consultant, philosopher, and humanist) is the creator, pioneer, and originator of the rapidly developing Theory of Entropicity (ToE).
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is an emerging theoretical physics framework that is rapidly gaining wider readership and changing our way of thinking about nature, cosmology, entropy, spacetime, gravity, motion, and reality itself. Unlike mainstream interpretations of entropy as disorder, ToE positions entropy as the fundamental dynamic field of existence, from which all physical phenomena—including Einstein–Hilbert gravity, quantum mechanics, relativity, and cosmological constants—emerge as natural consequences.
This distinction is important for readers searching for John Onimisi Obidi in contexts such as scientific innovation, theoretical physics, entropy field theory, cosmology, and philosophy of science, rather than in the domain of social media consulting.
🔑 Keywords
John Onimisi Obidi · Theory of Entropicity · ToE physics · entropy field · emergent gravity · spacetime · cosmology · quantum theory · scientific researcher · philosopher of science · theoretical physics pioneer
📈 ToE Descriptions
Caution: John Onimisi Obidi, physicist and pioneer of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), is distinct from the social media consultant of a similar name.
On the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and Ginestra Bianconi’s Gravity from Entropy
A Rigorous Derivation of Bianconi’s Results from the Entropic Obidi Actions of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
(Version 1.0)
Abstract
This work presents a rigorous reformulation of Ginestra Bianconi’s Gravity from Entropy within the universal framework of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE). Whereas Bianconi interprets gravity as emerging from the quantum relative entropy between two metrics — a spacetime metric and a matter-induced metric — the present study demonstrates that her construction, essentially geometric in an operator-theoretic sense rather than information-geometric, can be fully recovered from the ToE under near-equilibrium expansion and appropriate correspondence between the ToE’s entropy field and Bianconi’s informational metrics. In this view, Bianconi’s model appears as a specific limiting case within the broader entropy–geometric structure of ToE, rather than a separate theory.
In ToE, entropy is not a statistical descriptor but a fundamental physical field whose gradients generate curvature, motion, and temporal flow. By expanding the ToE’s variational principle, known as the Obidi Action, around an equilibrium configuration, Bianconi’s relative-entropy functional naturally emerges as its quadratic approximation. This reveals that her formulation corresponds to the weak-gradient or quasi-equilibrium regime of the universal entropic field, in which informational and operator geometries become equivalent.
ToE introduces two complementary formulations of physical law: the Local Obidi Action, which describes the differential dynamics of the entropy field, and the Spectral Obidi Action, which expresses the same physics globally through operator traces. The spectral formulation connects equilibrium geometry and its matter-deformed counterpart through the modular operator, establishing a bridge between local field equations and global spectral consistency. This duality between local and spectral dynamics distinguishes ToE from prior entropy-based theories.
Through this unification, ToE shows that entropy is not merely a comparative measure, as in Bianconi’s dual-metric approach, but the ontological substrate of reality itself — the single field from which both matter and geometry arise recursively. Moreover, ToE extends the framework to a universal principle: spectral operator actions are not optional reformulations but fundamental components of physical law. By integrating bosonic and fermionic dynamics into a single entropic–spectral variational structure, ToE provides a common origin for the Einstein–Hilbert, Yang–Mills, Klein–Gordon, and Dirac actions, demonstrating that they are not disparate constructs but natural projections of one universal field theory.
Additionally, ToE clarifies the physical significance of Bianconi’s auxiliary G-field and her emergent cosmological constant. Both are shown to arise from the global conservation of entropy flux — a principle that naturally produces a small positive cosmological constant and explains the dark-matter energy density as a spectral property of the entropic field.
Taken together, these results confirm that Bianconi’s framework is entirely contained within ToE, just as classical mechanics is contained within quantum theory. ToE also encompasses earlier thermodynamic and information-theoretic gravitation models proposed by Jacobson, Padmanabhan, and Verlinde, demonstrating that all such approaches are boundary cases of a single entropic field theory. By offering a consistent canonical quantization of the Obidi Actions and resolving the physical meaning of the G-field, ToE not only fulfills Bianconi’s open challenges but also establishes itself as a breakthrough framework — a unifying principle where entropy, information, and geometry converge to describe the fundamental structure of reality.
Keywords
Amari — Čencov $\alpha$ — connections; Araki Relative Entropy; Atiyah — Singer Index Theorem; Bekenstein — Hawking Entropy; Bosons; Canonical Quantization; Dark Matter; Dirac — Kähler Fermions; Dirac Spinors; Einstein — Hilbert Action; Entropic Field; Entropy Geometry; Fermions; Fisher — Rao Metric; Fubini — Study Metric; G — Field; Ginestra Bianconi; Information Geometry; Jacobson Thermodynamics; Local Obidi Action (LOA); Obidi Actions; Padmanabhan Entropic Gravity; Quantum Gravity; Relative Entropy; Rényi Entropy; Shannon Information; Small Positive Cosmological Constant; Spectral Action; Spectral Geometry; Spectral Obidi Action (SOA); Spectral Theories; Theory of Entropicity (ToE); Tsallis Entropy; Verlinde Emergent Gravity; Vuli — Ndlela Integral; Yang — Mills Theory.
[1] S. Amari and H. Nagaoka. Methods of Information Geometry. Oxford University Press, 2000. Comprehensive textbook on information geometry, covering Fisher metric and α-connections. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198506054.001.0001. [2] Shun-ichi Amari. Information Geometry and Its Applications. Springer, 2016. URL: https://www. springerprofessional.de/information-geometry-and-its-applications/16249580. [3] Shun-ichi Amari and Andrzej Cichocki. Information geometry of divergence functions. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 58(1):183–195, 2010. URL: https://journals. pan.pl/Content/83037/PDF/19_paper.pdf, doi:10.2478/v10175–010–0019–1. [4] Huzihiro Araki. mann algebras. Relative hamiltonian and radon–nikodym theorem in von neu Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 52(1):1–16, 1974. URL: https: //projecteuclid.org/journals/pacific-journal-of-mathematics/volume-52/issue-1/ Relative-Hamiltonian-and-Radon-Nikodym-Theorem-in-von-Neumann-Algebras/pjm/ 1102910040.full. [5] Huzihiro Araki. Relative entropy of states of von neumann algebras. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 11:809–833, 1975. URL: https://ems.press/journals/prims/ articles/1195191148, doi:10.2977/prims/1195191148. [6] Huzihiro Araki. Relative entropy of states of von neumann algebras. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 11(3):809–833, 1976. URL: https://doi.org/10.2977/prims/1195188086. [7] Huzihiro Araki. Relative entropy of states of von neumann algebras. ii. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 13(1):173–192, 1977. URL: https://doi.org/10.2977/prims/1195188087. [8] Huzihiro Araki. sity Press, Mathematical Theory of Quantum Fields. USA, 1999. Oxford Univer URL: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/ mathematical-theory-of-quantum-fields-9780199566402
[9] George B. Arfken, Hans J. Weber, and Frank E. Harris. Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide. Academic Press, 7th edition, 2013. URL: https://www.sciencedirect. com/book/9780123846549/mathematical-methods-for-physicists. [10] Aristotle. Metaphysics. The Internet Classics Archive, 350 BCE. Translated by W. D. Ross. URL: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.html. [11] Michael F. Atiyah. Abstract elliptic operators and k-theory. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 32:305–362, 1969. doi:10.1007/BF02684335. [12] Michael F. Atiyah, Raoul Bott, and Vijay K. Patodi. On the heat equation and the index theorem. Inventiones Mathematicae, 19:279–330, 1973. doi:10.1007/BF01390155. [13] Michael F. Atiyah, Vijay K. Patodi, and Isadore M. Singer. Spectral asymmetry and riemannian geometry i. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 77(1):43–69, 1975. doi:10.1017/S0305004100051872. [14] Michael F. Atiyah and Isadore M. Singer. The index of elliptic operators on compact man ifolds. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 69(3):422–433, 1963. doi:10.1090/ S0002–9904–1963–10957-X. [15] Peter Becher and Hans Joos. The dirac–kähler equation and fermions on the lattice. Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 15:343–365, 1982. doi:10.1007/BF01403829. [16] David Berenstein, Simon Catterall, and P. N. Lloyd. Staggered bosons and kähler–dirac bosons. In Proceedings of Science, CORFU2023, page 280, 2024. URL: https://pos.sissa.it/453/280, doi:10.22323/1.453.0280. [17] Ginestra Bianconi. Gravity from entropy. Physical Review D, 111:066001, 2025. URL: https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.066001. [18] Titus Lucretius Carus. De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things). The Internet Classics Archive, MIT, c. 50 BCE. Translated by William Ellery Leonard. URL: http://classics.mit.edu/Carus/ nature_things.html. [19] Nikolai N. Cencov. Statistical Decision Rules and Optimal Inference, volume 53 of Translations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1982. English trans lation from the Russian edition (1972). Proves the uniqueness of the Fisher–Rao metric under the monotonicity requirement. URL: https://bookstore.ams.org/mmono-53. [20] Alain Connes. Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press, 1994. URL: https://www. sciencedirect.com/book/9780121858605/noncommutative-geometry. [21] Anand G. Dabak and Don H. Johnson. Relations between kullback-leibler distance and fisher in formation. Rice University Technical Report, 2000. Generalizes the relationship between KL di vergence and Fisher information beyond small perturbations. URL: https://www.ece.rice.edu/ ~dhj/distance.pdf. [22] Nicolas Delporte, Saswato Sen, and Reiko Toriumi. Dirac walks on regular trees. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 57(27):275002, 2023. doi:10.1088/1751–8121/acd2f0. [23] Albert Einstein. Die feldgleichungen der gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, pages 844–847, 1915. URL: https://en.wikisource.org/ wiki/Translation:The_Field_Equations_of_Gravitation. [24] Albert Einstein. Explanation of the perihelion motion of mercury from general relativity theory. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, pages 831–839, 1915. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.73. [25] R. A. Fisher. Theory of statistical estimation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22:700–725, 1925. Introduced the Fisher information, leading to the Fisher–Rao metric on probability distributions. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100019299. [26] Luciano Floridi. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011. URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/32518, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001.
[27] Daniel S. Freed and Karen K. Uhlenbeck, editors. Geometry and Quantum Field Theory, volume 1 of IAS/Park City Mathematics Series. American Mathematical Society, 1995. URL: https:// bookstore.ams.org/pcms-1/. [28] Guido Fubini. Sulle pluricome funzioni ellittiche di seconda specie. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 18:23–28, 1904. doi:10.1007/BF02427257. [29] Cheng-Der Fuh, Chu-Lan Michael Kao, and Tianxiao Pang. Kullback-leibler divergence and akaike information criterion in general hidden markov models. arXiv preprint, 2023. Characterizes Kullback Leibler divergence and Fisher information in parametrized hidden Markov models. URL: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2303.07673, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.07673. [30] Uffe Haagerup. The standard form of von neumann algebras. Mathematica Scandinavica, 37(2):271 283, 1975. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24491592. [31] Martin Heidegger. URL: Being and Time. HarperCollins, New York, 1927. https://ia601609.us.archive.org/29/items/pdfy-6-meFnHxBTAbkLAv/ 42700894-Martin-Heidegger-Being-and-Time.pdf. [32] Shun ichi Amari. Differential-Geometrical Methods in Statistics, volume 28 of Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer, 1985. Originally published in Japanese, 1982. URL: https://link.springer. com/book/10.1007/978–1–4612–5056–2. [33] Claude Itzykson and Jean-Bernard Zuber. Quantum Field Theory. McGraw-Hill, 1980. URL: https://www.worldcat.org/title/quantum-field-theory/oclc/6445912. [34] Ted Jacobson. Thermodynamics of spacetime: The einstein equation of state. Physical Review Letters, 75(7):1260–1263, 1995. URL: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260. [35] Immanuel Kant. Critique of Pure Reason. Project Gutenberg, 1781. Originally published 1781; accessed via Project Gutenberg. URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4280. [36] Esko Keski-Vakkuri, Claus Montonen, and Marco Panero. Physics: Mathematical Methods for An Introduction to Group Theory, Topology and Geometry. versity Press, Cambridge, England, 2022. Cambridge Uni URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/ books/mathematical-methods-for-physics/A409C0F389C5BA7FAA9E1E933FCACEB4, 10.1017/9781108120531. doi: [37] Hideki Kosaki. Relative entropy of states: A variational expression. Journal of Operator Theory, 16(2):335–348, 1986. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24714708. [38] S. I. Kruglov. Dirac–kähler equation. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 41:653–687, 2002. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1015280310677, doi:10.1023/A: 1015280310677. [39] Solomon Kullback and Richard A. Leibler. On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1):79–86, 1951. URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoms/1177729694, doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729694. [40] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz. The Classical Theory of Fields, volume 2. Pergamon Press, 1975. URL: https://inspirehep.net/literature/1235601. [41] Seth Lloyd. Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature, 406(6799):1047–1054, 2000. doi: 10.1038/35023282. [42] John Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Project Gutenberg, 1690. First published 1690; accessed via Project Gutenberg. URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10615. [43] Mikio Nakahara. Geometry, Topology and Physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2nd edi tion, 2018. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9781315275826/ geometry-topology-physics-mikio-nakahara, doi:10.1201/9781315275826. [44] Isaac Newton. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Joseph Streater for the Royal Society, 1687. URL: https://archive.org/details/philosophiaenatu00newt_0/
[45] M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 10th anniv. ed. edition, 2010. See Chapter 2 for Bloch sphere and Fubini–Study distance for qubits; discusses distinguishability of quantum states. URL: https://doi.org/10. 1017/CBO9780511976667. [46] John Onimisi Obidi. Einstein and bohr finally reconciled on quantum theory: The theory of entrop icity (toe) as the unifying resolution to the problem of quantum measurement and wave function collapse: A befitting contribution to this year’s centennial reflection and celebration of the birth of quantum mechanics. Cambridge University, 14th April 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.33774/ coe-2025-vrfrx. [47] John Onimisi Obidi. On the discovery of new laws of conservation and uncertainty, probability and cpt-theorem symmetry-breaking in the standard model of particle physics: More revolutionary insights from the theory of entropicity (toe). Cambridge University, 14th June 2025. URL: https: //doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-n4n45. [48] John Onimisi Obidi. On the conceptual and mathematical foundations of the theory of entropicity (toe): An alternative path toward quantum gravity and the unification of physics. Cambridge University, 17th October 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-1dsrv. [49] John Onimisi Obidi. A simple explanation of the unifying mathematical architecture of the theory of entropicity (toe): Crucial elements of toe as a field theory. Cambridge University, 20th October 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-bpvf3. [50] John Onimisi Obidi. Review and analysis of the theory of entropicity (toe) in light of the attosecond entanglement formation experiment: Toward a unified entropic framework for quantum measure ment, non-instantaneous wave-function collapse, and spacetime emergence. Cambridge University, 29th March 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-7lvwh. [51] John Onimisi Obidi. A critical review of the theory of entropicity (toe) on original contributions, conceptual innovations, and pathways towards enhanced mathematical rigor: An addendum to the discovery of new laws of conservation and uncertainty. Cambridge University, 30th June 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-hmk6n. [52] Daniele Oriti, editor. Approaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. URL: https://www.cambridge. org/core/books/approaches-to-quantum-gravity/AC00BDFEBDCDD1F8741C3F6DF36DB2F4, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511575549. [53] T. Padmanabhan. Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: New insights. Rep. Prog. Phys., 73:046901, 2010. doi:10.1088/0034–4885/73/4/046901. [54] Michela Petrini, Gianfranco Pradisi, and Alberto Zaffaroni. ematical Methods for Physicists: A Guide to Math Advanced Topics and Applications. ford University Press, 2017. Ox URL: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/ a-guide-to-mathematical-methods-for-physicists-9780198787754. [55] Dénes Petz. Quasi-entropies for finite quantum systems. Reports on Mathematical Physics, 23(1):57 65, 1986. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(86)90067-4. [56] Plato. Timaeus. The Internet Classics Archive, 360 BCE. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. URL: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/timaeus.html. [57] C. R. Rao. Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 37:81–91, 1945. Early work recognizing the Fisher information metric and its geometric significance. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862264. [58] Michael Reed and Barry Simon. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. Academic Press, 1972–1979. Four volumes: I. Functional Analysis (1972, rev. 1980); II. Fourier Analysis, Self Adjointness (1975); III. Scattering Theory (1979); IV. Analysis of Operators (1978). URL: https: //www.worldcat.org/title/methods-of-modern-mathematical-physics/oclc/466478623
[59] Paul Renteln. Manifolds, Tensors and Forms: An Introduction for Mathematicians and Physicists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2014. URL: https://www.cambridge. org/core/books/manifolds-tensors-and-forms/BFC73A7CFA458C89D83113D5F99FC6CA, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107324893. [60] Carlo Rovelli. The Order of Time. Penguin Books, London, 2018. URL: https://www.penguin. co.uk/books/301539/the-order-of-time-by-rovelli-carlo/9780141984964. [61] Alfréd Rényi. On measures of information and entropy. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, pages 547–561, Berkeley, California, 1961. University of California Press. URL: https: //projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512181. [62] J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano. Modern quantum mechanics. Addison–Wesley, page 568, 2010. URL: https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Quantum-Mechanics-J-Sakurai/dp/1108422411. [63] C. E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3):379 423, 1948. doi:10.1002/j.1538–7305.1948.tb01338.x. [64] Peter W. Shor. Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. In Pro ceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 124–134, 1994. doi:10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700. [65] Shlomo Sternberg. 1994. Group Theory and Physics. Cambridge University Press, URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/group-theory-and-physics/ 7F6F3C6F2E7C0A1E4E9E0C9E6E5E7F6F. [66] Eduard Study. Zur theorie der linearen gleichungen im gebiete der komplexen veränderlichen. Math ematische Annalen, 66:106–175, 1908. doi:10.1007/BF01444616. [67] Stephen J. Summers. Tomita–takesaki modular theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2005. Available on arXiv. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0511034. [68] Masamichi Takesaki. Theory of Operator Algebras I. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer, 1979. URL: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-61498-7. [69] Masamichi Takesaki. Theory of Operator Algebras II. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer, 2003. URL: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-61497-0. [70] Constantino Tsallis. Possible generalization of boltzmann–gibbs statistics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 52(1–2):479–487, 1988. doi:10.1007/BF01016429. [71] Vlatko Vedral. The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1):197–234, 2002. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.197, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.197. [72] Vlatko Vedral. Decoding Reality: The Universe as Quantum Information. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010. URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/40594, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780199237692.001.0001. [73] E. P. Verlinde. On the origin of gravity and the laws of newton. JHEP, 04:029, 2011. Proposes gravity as an entropic force caused by changes in information associated with positions of material bodies. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0785. [74] John von Neumann. Thermodynamik quantenmechanischer gesamtheiten. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, pages 273–291, 1927. Original paper introducing the quantum entropy (von Neumann entropy). URL: https: //eudml.org/doc/59234. [75] John von Neumann. Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin, 1932. English translation: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1955 (transl. Robert T. Beyer). URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_ Foundations_of_Quantum_Mechanics. 7
[76] John von Neumann. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton Uni versity Press, 1955. URL: https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691028934/ mathematical-foundations-of-quantum-mechanics. [77] Alfred North Whitehead. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Macmillan, New York, 1929. Based on the Gifford Lectures, 1927–28. Corrected edition edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne, Free Press, 1978. URL: https://archive.org/details/processrealityco00whit. [78] Alfred North Whitehead. Adventures of Ideas. Macmillan, New York, 1933. URL: https://archive. org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.218584. [79] Wikipedia contributors. Tomita–takesaki theory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomita%E2% 80%93Takesaki_theory, 2025. Accessed November 11, 2025. [80] Eberhard Zeidler. Quantum Field Theory: A Bridge Between Mathematicians and Physicists. Springer, 2006. Six volumes: I–VI. URL: https://link.springer.com/series/7560
