The Eventual Divorce and Dissolution of the Marriage Between Tradition and Entropy in Modern Theoretical Physics: The New Monogamy of Entropy in the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
In every sense of the word, the Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is a radical departure from the "Tradition" physicists have embraced for centuries.
While traditional physics has spent a century trying to force General Relativity (the physics of the big) and Quantum Mechanics (the physics of the small) into a single box, Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity (ToE) declares that the box itself is made of something else entirely: Entropy.
The "Traditional" vs. "Entropic" Divorce
Here is how ToE breaks away from the classical and modern traditions of [theoretical] physics:
1. From Geometry to Field
* Traditional (Einstein's Relativity): Space and time are a geometric fabric. Gravity is the "dent" in that fabric.
* Theory of Entropicity—ToE (Obidi): Spacetime is a secondary "hallucination." What is actually there is a Dynamic Entropic Field (S). Gravity is just matter moving along "Entropic Geodesics"—the paths that require the least amount of informational effort.
2. From "Spooky" to "Structural"
* Traditional (Bohr/Heisenberg): Measurement is a mystery. Particles are waves until a human (or a "measurement device") looks at them. No one knows why the wave "collapses."
* Theory of Entropicity—ToE (Obidi): Measurement is a physical cost. It’s an exchange of information that requires a specific amount of entropy. The "collapse" isn't a magical event; it's just the moment a system crosses the ln 2 Curvature Threshold.
3. The Speed of Light (c) is no longer a "Givens"
* Traditional: c is a fundamental constant. We don't know why it’s 299,792,458 m/s; it just is.
* Theory of Entropicity—ToE (Obidi): c is the maximum rate of entropic rearrangement/dialogue/redistribution/reconfiguration. Light isn't just fast; it’s the speed limit of how quickly the universe's "entropic ledger" can update itself.
The "Accounting Mechanism" View of Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
One of the most disruptive parts of Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) is its "No-Rush Theorem." It treats the universe like a Self-Consistent Ledger or a computer with a finite processing speed.
| Tradition | How it sees an Object | How ToE sees an Object |
|---|---|---|
| Classical | A collection of atoms in space. | A stable "configuration" of the entropic field. |
| Relativity | Something that warps spacetime. | A localized "cost" that slows the entropic flow. |
| Quantum | A probability wave. | A state waiting for enough "entropic synchronization" to become "real." |
Why this Divorce is a "Beautiful" Break Orchestrated and Officiated by Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Undoubtedly, Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE) removes the "weirdness" of the observer. In the old tradition, humans were special. In the Theory of Entropicity (ToE), a human is only one of many entropic events and phenomena in the universe and in nature; albeit a very complex, very high-entropy system. We don't "create" reality by looking at it; we simply synchronize with it because our internal entropic complexity is high enough to force a resolution.
What's next?
The math behind this—the Obidi Action and the Vuli-Ndlela Integral—actually derives Einstein’s equations as a "special case" where entropy is low.
Would you like to explore how ToE explains "Time Dilation" as an entropic cost rather than just a weird quirk of fast travel?
The Dissolution of the Traditional Paradigm and the Emergence of Entropic Monism
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and the End of Geometric–Quantum Dualism
For centuries, theoretical physics has operated under a tacit but powerful assumption: that the universe is fundamentally built from structures such as space, time, matter, and fields, with entropy relegated to a secondary, statistical role. From Newtonian mechanics to Einstein’s relativity and quantum theory, entropy has been treated as a bookkeeping tool—useful, but not fundamental.
The Theory of Entropicity (ToE), developed by John Onimisi Obidi, represents a decisive break from this tradition. It does not attempt to reconcile General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics within a shared mathematical container. Instead, it asserts something far more radical: the container itself is emergent. What physics has long taken as fundamental—spacetime geometry, quantum states, particles, and forces—are, in ToE, secondary manifestations of a deeper, universal entropic field.
In this sense, ToE marks the formal separation of modern physics from its geometric and quantum inheritance, replacing it with a unified, entropy-centric ontology. This is not a refinement of tradition; it is a clean conceptual divorce.
From Geometry to Entropic Field
In Einstein’s General Relativity, spacetime is the primary arena of reality. Matter and energy curve this geometric fabric, and gravity is nothing more than the response of objects to that curvature. Geometry is ontologically fundamental; dynamics follow from it.
The Theory of Entropicity reverses this order entirely. In ToE, spacetime is not fundamental at all. It is an emergent construct, a macroscopic approximation arising from the behavior of a deeper entity: the dynamic entropic field . Geometry is not prior to physics; it is a projection of informational structure.
Within this framework, gravity is no longer the curvature of spacetime but the flow of matter along entropic gradients. Objects move along paths of least informational resistance—entropic geodesics—defined not by metric curvature but by entropy redistribution. Spacetime appears only as a convenient low-entropy description of these deeper processes.
From Quantum Mystery to Entropic Structure
Traditional quantum mechanics, particularly in its Copenhagen interpretation, leaves measurement as an unresolved mystery. A system evolves deterministically according to the Schrödinger equation, yet “collapses” into a definite outcome upon observation. Why this happens, and what constitutes a measurement, remains philosophically unsettled.
The Theory of Entropicity removes this mystery by reframing measurement as a physical entropic process. Measurement is not an abstract epistemic act but an informational transaction with a definite thermodynamic cost. The so-called “collapse” of the wavefunction corresponds to the moment when an interaction crosses a minimum distinguishability threshold, identified in ToE with the Obidi Curvature Invariant (OCI), ln 2.
In this view, quantum indeterminacy persists only while informational distinctions remain below this threshold. Once the entropic cost of maintaining superposition exceeds ln 2, the system must resolve into a definite configuration. No observer is privileged in this process; any sufficiently complex entropic interaction can produce the same outcome.
The Speed of Light as an Entropic Constraint
In traditional physics, the speed of light is postulated as a fundamental constant without deeper explanation. It sets the maximum speed of causal influence, but its origin remains unexplained.
In the Theory of Entropicity, acquires a clear physical meaning. It represents the maximum rate at which the entropic field can reorganize information. Light travels at this speed not because it is special, but because it propagates at the upper bound of entropic update capacity. Faster communication would require the universe to process informational changes more rapidly than its entropic structure allows.
Thus, relativistic causality emerges naturally from entropic accounting, not from axiomatic geometry.
The Universe as an Entropic Accounting System
A defining feature of ToE is the No-Rush Theorem, which states that all physical processes require finite entropic time to occur. The universe behaves as a self-consistent informational ledger, in which entropy must be locally and globally conserved, reconciled, and propagated.
Within this accounting framework:
- Objects are not collections of particles in space but stable configurations of the entropic field.
- Mass is not merely energy but entropic resistance, slowing the redistribution of information.
- Quantum states are pre-resolved informational configurations, awaiting sufficient entropic synchronization to become classical events.
This single perspective subsumes classical mechanics, relativity, and quantum theory as different entropic regimes of the same underlying field.
The End of the Observer’s Privilege
One of the most profound consequences of the Theory of Entropicity is the removal of the observer from any privileged role in physics. Traditional interpretations of quantum mechanics elevate observation to a special status, often blurring the line between physics and consciousness.
ToE eliminates this anthropocentrism entirely. Humans do not “create” reality by observing it. Rather, they are high-entropy subsystems capable of forcing informational resolution through interaction. Measurement occurs not because a mind is present, but because sufficient entropic complexity is involved.
Reality resolves itself when the entropic cost demands it.
Mathematical Foundations and Future Directions
The conceptual architecture of ToE is supported by a rigorous mathematical framework, including:
- the Local Obidi Action (LOA) governing microscopic entropic dynamics,
- the Spectral Obidi Action (SOA) encoding global informational geometry,
- the Vuli–Ndlela Integral, which ensures global entropic consistency,
- and the Master Entropic Equation (MEE), from which Einstein’s field equations arise as a low-entropy limit.
In this sense, General Relativity is not rejected but recovered—as a special case of entropic dynamics under conditions of minimal informational curvature.
Closing Perspective
The Theory of Entropicity does not merely reinterpret known physics; it reorders its foundations. It declares entropy to be monogamous with reality—no longer a secondary descriptor, but the sole fundamental substrate from which geometry, matter, time, and quantum behavior emerge.
What appears, from within tradition, as a divorce from established frameworks is, from within ToE, a long-overdue recognition:
physics has always been about entropy—it simply took this long to say so explicitly.
References
1)
https://theoryofentropicity.blogspot.com/2026/01/the-eventual-divorce-and-dissolution-of.html
2)
No comments:
Post a Comment