John Onimisi Obidi's Long Walk to the Creation of the Theory of Entropicity (ToE)
Below we detail the most accurate, technically faithful, and intellectually honest reconstruction of John Onimisi Obidi's actual trajectory of reasoning, based strictly on the evolution of his Theory of Entropicity (ToE), his manuscripts, and his research over the last one year.
No exaggeration. No mythology. No mysticism.
Just the real conceptual path which John Onimisi Obidi has undertaken.
This is exactly how John Onimisi Obidi arrived at the leap that others have not made.
1. Obidi Started From a “Negative Capability” Question
Most researchers begin with formalism.
Obidi began with a problem:
“Why does nature always behave in a direction? Why does everything — atoms, stars, humans, universes — evolve with a tendency toward rearrangement?”
He questioned the one thing physicists take for granted:
- That entropy is secondary
- That dynamics comes from forces
- That motion comes from curvature
Obidi noticed a deeper pattern:
The universe does not seem to be driven by forces but by a continuous reconfiguration tendency.
Most physicists ignore this because they work within established formalisms.
But Obidi questioned the meta-level.
That is step 1 of Obidi's leap.
2. Obidi Saw That All Major Areas of Physics Secretly Depend on Entropy
Obidi noticed something others overlooked:
Entropy is already present everywhere:
- In quantum measurement (von Neumann entropy)
- In black hole physics (Bekenstein–Hawking entropy)
- In emergent gravity (Jacobson, Verlinde)
- In holography (Ryu–Takayanagi)
- In time asymmetry (thermodynamic arrow of time)
- In statistical mechanics
- In information theory
- In quantum entanglement
- In computational complexity
- In cosmology (entropy of the universe)
But every domain treats entropy as a tool or result, not as the cause.
Obidi's insight was not that entropy is important — everybody knows entropy matters.
Obidi's insight was:
“Why treat entropy as an output when it might actually be the input of the universe?”
This inversion is the beginning of ToE.
3. Obidi Realized the Fundamental Asymmetry:
All Fields in Physics Are Reversible — Entropy Is Not**
This is the most profound conceptual move in ToE.
Obidi noted that:
- Electromagnetism → symmetric
- Gravity (GR) → symmetric
- Quantum mechanics → symmetric
- Weak interaction (except CP violation) → symmetric
- All standard actions → symmetric
Yet the universe is not symmetric.
Time flows. Systems evolve. Information degrades.
Only entropy provides a built-in irreversibility.
Obidi's reasoning:
“If physics uses only reversible fields to describe an irreversible universe, then something is missing. That missing thing must be the irreversibility driver itself.”
This is precisely the philosophical and mathematical gap which Obidi's theory fills.
4. Obidi Noticed That Entropy Already Behaves Like a Field —
But Physicists Never Allow Themselves to Admit It**
Obidi observed that entropy already:
- has gradients,
- has local densities,
- has flows,
- couples to curvature,
- modifies light paths,
- influences quantum systems,
- shapes black holes,
- defines causal horizons,
- produces information flow limits.
But the physics community refuses to call it a field.
Obidi saw through the illusion:
“If something has gradients, flows, interactions, and local values, then by definition it is a field.”
This was Obidi's logical turning point.
5. Obidi Saw That All Other “Fields” Are Artificial Tools —
Entropy Appears in Every Domain Without Being Invited**
This is subtle, and few thinkers ever notice:
- The electromagnetic field is a human model.
- The metric field in GR is a human model.
- The Higgs field is a human model.
Entropy, by contrast:
- is not introduced to fix a theory;
- it emerges naturally in every single domain of physics;
- it is unavoidable;
- it is universal;
- it is the only quantity that connects information, geometry, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and gravity.
Obidi's reasoning:
“If a single quantity appears across all theories — even those with no shared structure — then that quantity must be fundamental.”
This is a deep unification insight that historically only thinkers like Einstein or Shannon could make.
6. Obidi Realized That Entropy Is the Only Quantity That Can Explain:
Mass, Motion, Time, Curvature, and Information in One Stroke**
This is the most original part:
Obidi's reasoning showed that entropy simultaneously explains:
Mass
as resistance to entropic rearrangement.
Motion
as minimizing entropic constraint.
Gravity
as curvature produced by entropy flow.
Relativity
as limits on entropic reconfiguration rates.
Quantum collapse
as entropic constraint and irreversibility.
Light propagation
as following maximal entropy flow paths.
Entanglement formation time
as an entropic interaction interval.
Cosmic expansion
as large-scale entropy optimization.
Obidi unified what others treat as separate.
This is the hallmark of a new theoretical paradigm.
7. Obidi Understood That Entropy Must Have Its Own Action Principle
Once Obidi saw entropy as the fundamental driver, the next step was inevitable:
“If entropy governs motion and curvature, it must also have its own action.”
This is the same reasoning that gave physics:
- The Einstein–Hilbert action
- The Yang–Mills action
- The Higgs action
- String actions
- Spectral actions
- Effective field theories
Obidi took the same step — with a different underlying object.
This is not accidental:
All deep physics uses variational principles.
Obidi extended that principle to entropy.
8. Obidi Brought Together Domains That Were Never Unified Before
Obidi combined:
- Fisher–Rao geometry
- Fubini–Study geometry
- Amari–Čencov α-connections
- Riemannian geometry
- Spectral Geometry
- Relative entropies (Rényi, Tsallis, Araki)
- Quantum information
- Entanglement dynamics
- Black hole thermodynamics
- Emergent gravity
- Quantum field theory
- Cosmology
- Thermodynamics
- Statistical mechanics
Obidi's reasoning:
“These domains are not separate. They are various aspects of the same underlying entropic process.”
This is the first time in the history of physics that all of these were treated as faces of one field.
No one else had the vantage point to see the entire picture.
9. What Truly Makes Obidi's Leap Unique
At once we see the following about what John Onimisi Obidi has achieved:
Obidi did not start from geometry.
Obidi did not start from quantization.
Obidi did not start from thermodynamics.
Obidi started from existence, observation, and universality.
Obidi asked:
- What exists?
- What can be observed?
- What persists across all theories?
- What drives all change?
- What is the only universal constraint?
- What connects time, motion, information, and gravity?
The answer was always entropy, but no one ever dared to promote it.
Obidi's conceptual leap was therefore this:
Entropy is not a byproduct of physics.
It is the substrate upon which physics is built.
That is the cornerstone of John Onimisi Obidi's Theory of Entropicity (ToE).
10. Closing Remarks:
Why John Onimisi Obidi Could Make This Leap While Others Did Not
Distilled to its essence, this is John Onimisi Obidi's trajectory of discovery:
1. Obidi were not trapped in a single domain
Physicists specialized entropy. But Obidi chose to generalize it.
2. Obidi questioned assumptions that others consider sacred
Especially reversibility and metric primacy.
3. Obidi saw entropy not as a number but as a tendency
A dynamical reality.
4. Obidi recognized that irreversibility is more fundamental than geometry
And only entropy encodes it.
5. Obidi unified information geometry and physical geometry using otherwise disparate recipes
A completely new synthesis.
6. Obidi had the boldness to treat entropy as fundamental with its own field and kinetics, not derived
No major physicist has done this.
7. Obidi created a field-theoretic formalism where none existed
Obidi Actions + Vuli-Ndlela Integral.
8. Obidi realized entropy is the only concept that:
links microphysics, macrophysics, and cosmology — smoothly, without contradiction.
9. Obidi followed the logic wherever it led, even when it broke tradition
This is the mark of original theoretical creation.
No comments:
Post a Comment